Force needed to hold together a capacitor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the force needed to hold together capacitor plates using two different methods. Method 1 analyzes the electric field in three regions and concludes that the total force is Q^2/Ae0, while Method 2 uses capacitance and energy to arrive at the same result. Participants debate the reasoning behind the electric fields in each region, particularly the effects of insulating plates and how charge distribution influences the fields. There is a consensus that both methods ultimately yield the same force, despite initial confusion over their differences. The conversation highlights the complexities of electric fields in capacitors and the implications of charge distribution on force calculations.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Homework Statement
The inner surfaces of 2 *insulating* plates are given a charge Q. What is the force required to hold them together?
Relevant Equations
F = 1/2 (E outside + E inside) * Q
I have 2 methods, which give 2 different solutions:
Let sigma = charge per unit area
Let plate 1 be the left plate, plate 2 = right plate.
Method 1:
Because they are insulating, consider the electric field at 3 regions; region 1 to the left of plate 1, region 2 between the plates, and region 3 to the right of plate 2.

Because the plates are insulating, Electric field in the regions are superpositions of the field due to each plate.
Region 1 has field = sigma/e0 + 0 = sigma/e0 directed leftwards,
Region 2 has field = sigma/e0 - sigma/e0 = 0,
Region 1 has field = sigma/e0 + 0 = sigma/e0 directed rightwards,

Average force on plate 1 = sigma/2e0 *Q (Average E field * Q)= Asigma^2/2e0 = Q^2/2Ae0, where A is area of plate. (force directed leftwards)
Similarly, force on plate 2 = Q^2/2Ae0. (force directed rightwards)

Thus, total force needed to hold the plates together is Q^2/Ae0.

Method 2:
Consider the capacitance of the system.
C = e0A/x, where x is plate separation.
Energy = Q^2x/2Ae0.
F = dE/dx = Q^2/2A e0.

Method 2 gives the correct answer. Why is method 1 wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have since realized why my 2 methods don't seem to "reconcile". Please do tell me if I'm right on this.

They in fact are the same thing. The force given by -dU/dx refers to the force experienced by each capacitor plate, which is exactly the same as what method 1 gives.
 
phantomvommand said:
Region 1 has field = sigma/e0 + 0 = sigma/e0 directed leftwards,
Region 2 has field = sigma/e0 - sigma/e0 = 0,
Not sure of your reasoning there. I would have said Region 1 has field = the sum of the fields from the two plates = sigma/(2e0) + sigma/(2e0) = sigma/e0 directed leftwards,
Likewise Region 2 has field = sigma/(2e0) - sigma/(2e0) = 0,
phantomvommand said:
Average force on plate 1 = sigma/2e0 *Q
Again, I would have argued that the field from plate 2 is sigma/(2e0), so the force is Q sigma/(2e0). There is no force on plate 1 from plate 1's field.
But I suppose your method works because plate 1 necessarily exerts equal and opposite fields each side, so on average exerts no field where it is.
phantomvommand said:
Thus, total force needed to hold the plates together is Q^2/Ae0.
Arguably, the question is unclear, but what they mean is, suppose you tied the plates together with a cord; what would the tension be in the cord?
 
haruspex said:
Not sure of your reasoning there. I would have said Region 1 has field = the sum of the fields from the two plates = sigma/(2e0) + sigma/(2e0) = sigma/e0 directed leftwards,
Likewise Region 2 has field = sigma/(2e0) - sigma/(2e0) = 0,

Again, I would have argued that the field from plate 2 is sigma/(2e0), so the force is Q sigma/(2e0). There is no force on plate 1 from plate 1's field.
But I suppose your method works because plate 1 necessarily exerts equal and opposite fields each side, so on average exerts no field where it is.

Arguably, the question is unclear, but what they mean is, suppose you tied the plates together with a cord; what would the tension be in the cord?

Thank you for your reply. Why would it be sigma/2e0 though? The plates are insulating here, so the charge of Q remains solely on 1 side of the plate. The other side has 0 charge. Thus, the E-field in the region in between is 0 (as the inner surface of the other plate creates a similar field in opp direction.)

However, the E-field in the region to the left of plate 1 is due to the E-field of plate 2, which is sigma/e0 leftwards.
Thus, the average E-field around plate 1 is given by (0 + sigma/e0) /2. The force on plate 1 is in fact due to the field of plate 2.
 
phantomvommand said:
The plates are insulating here, so the charge of Q remains solely on 1 side of the plate. The other side has 0 charge.
The charge doesn't know it is on the surface of a plate. Half the field lines will go each side. Insulators don't block fields.
 
  • Like
Likes phantomvommand
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top