Force on a permanent magnet from an electromagnet

AI Thread Summary
When a permanent ring magnet (B2) is placed in a fixed electromagnetic coil (B1) with their magnetic fields oriented at 90 degrees to each other, it will not experience a strong magnetic torque or rotation due to the orthogonal arrangement. The interaction between the two fields is minimal when they are perfectly perpendicular, as they do not exert force on each other in that configuration. However, if the angle is altered slightly, the fields can interact, resulting in torque and force on the ring magnet. The formula for calculating the force in this context is F(x) = (3μₒ/π) * m1 * m2 * (1/x^4), but adjustments may be needed to account for the angle. The stability of the magnet is akin to a ball balanced on a cone, remaining stable until disturbed.
Chris Fuccillo
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
Hi again and thank you again for the help

If I have two magnetic fields, one permanent ring magnet B2 free floating on a fixed electromagnetic coil B1 and the field are perpendicular 90 deg to each other will the free floating permanent ring magnet feel a strong magnetic torque and rotate? Ever where I read so far as long as there is a gradient or the field is at an angle greater than 0 deg there is force/torque on the ring magnet. I have not seen an example where the fields are at 90 deg/perpendicular is this special case like when the fields are at 0 deg/ parallel?

B2 = permanent magnetic

B1 = electromagnet coil

F1 = Force/magnetic torque

B2 ↑ B1→ =F1↗

Or

B2 ↓ B1→ =F1↘
If the above is true can you point me to the proper formula for calculating the force. When it comes to the magnetic fields, the distances in the calculations are in millimeters and fractions of a millimeters. I believe this leaves me stuck using formula correct? F(x)= (3μₒ/π) *m1*m1* (1/xˆ4). I think there should be a cos or tan function to it where I am at 90 deg now
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Off the top of my head the magnet is marginally stable. This is like a ball balanced on the tip of a cone. It will stay there until the slightest breeze starts tipping it one way or the other. Then it falls.

Since fields are linear, two fields completely orthogonal to one another don't really interact. But tip one just a little and that's not true anymore.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top