Force on current carrying conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the constant of proportionality, k, in the equation for the force on a current-carrying conductor, where k equals 1 in SI units. This simplification allows for the definition of the Tesla, making calculations straightforward when using standard units. When a wire carries a current of 1 Amp and is 1 meter long, oriented at 90 degrees to a magnetic field of 1 Tesla, the resulting force is 1 Newton. The inclusion of sin(theta) accounts for angles other than 90 degrees between the current and the magnetic field. Changing the unit of length would necessitate adjusting the value of k to maintain consistency in the equation.
uzair_ha91
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I found this sentence in my textbook very confusing:

"...where k is constant of
proportionality. If we follow SI units, the value of k is 1."
Thus in
SI units, F=kILBsin<theta>=ILBsin<theta>

Why is the value of k taken as 1 only because we're following the SI units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Set k = 1 allows you to define the Tesla in SI units. If a wire is carrying a current of 1 Amp and is 1 metre long and is orientated so the direction of current flow is 90 degrees to a magnetic field of 1 Telsa then the force acting on the wire will be 1N. The sin theta bit is for when the current or moving charge is at any other angle than 90 degree to the magnetic field direction.
 
uzair_ha91 said:
Why is the value of k taken as 1 only because we're following the SI units?
Systems of units are set up to make the fundamental equations simpler. (SI Units are not the only system of units.)

You would agree, I trust, that if you measured the length in units of one-half meter (instead of the usual meter), you'd need to modify that force equation by choosing a different constant of proportionality? (k = 1/2)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top