1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Forced Vibration with changing amplitude

  1. Nov 21, 2011 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    I have a damped forced vibration problem. Most problems I have dealt with have a constant amplitude sinusoidal force such as F_0sin(wt). Lets say you have an applied force that decreases each second at a constant rate over 11 seconds. It looks like this:

    F=0.5*[(11-t)sin(2*pi*t)+(11-t)]; (0<= t >=11)

    The graph of this force has been attached.

    2. Relevant equations

    The system is also critically damped so the system's differential equation is:

    m[d^2/dt^2](x) + c(dx/dt) +kx = 0.5*[(11-t)sin(2*pi*t)+(11-t)]


    3. The attempt at a solution

    From here i'm not too sure how to proceed. Normally with forced vibration the solution would include both a complimentary and particlular soluntion since it is a nonhomogenous linear second order differential equation. So

    x = x_c + x_p

    If the force had a constant magnitude (steady state vibration) and assuming critical damping x_c would look like:

    x_c=(A+B*t)e^(-W_n*t)

    but since the vibration is not steady state does this equation hold true? I assume it does only because the complimentary solution is found by setting the force to zero and assuming only free vibration. A and B are then found using the initial conditions where:

    A= x_c(0) or is it A=x(0)
    B=Dx(0)/dt + w_n*x(0)

    Then x_p needs to be found and this im having trouble with. how would one solve this part of the differential?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 21, 2011 #2

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    A problem like this lends itself to Laplace transform technique. That means that those of us who deal in transient (and other!) problems tend to forget the classical math!

    Looking back (50 years!) I see that the only rigorous way to solve this classically is via variation of parameters. Yuk.

    If you will allow a moment of grandstanding - I think ALL linear, constant-coefficient diff. eq's (except for 1st order IF you can separate variables) should be solved by the Laplace transform. It reduces the diff eq to an algebraic equation and elegantly includes initial conditions and forcing functions like your oddball one. It's easy to learn; why it isn't introduced at an early stage in a diff eq course is beyond my comprehension.

    I'm prepared to consider having a crack at this and getting you an answer so you could check your solution with mine. But it's a messy problem and I might give out along the way.
     
  4. Nov 21, 2011 #3
    i appreciate the response. i haven't covered laplace transforms much since 2nd year university and even then it dealt with simple constant amplitude periodic forces such as F_0(sin(wt)). how would i start analyzing a linearly decaying force? could you possibly point me in a direction or recommend texts that would allow me to gain a better understanding of laplace transforms dealing with time decaying forces?
     
  5. Nov 21, 2011 #4

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Sorry, I didn't notice - you HAVE had Laplace! Makes it easy! Just transform your forcing function using tables of transforms. The fact that the input ends at t = 11 means you need the U(t-tau) transform in your forcing function.

    There are very many books on the Laplace transform. My books are probably out of print but if you can obtain H H Skilling's 'Electrical Engineering Circuits' he is unbeatable as an instructor. He covers the important parts whike relating to electrical circuits, and he doesn't overdo the highfalutin stuff.

    Also try Wikipedia! The price is right!

    Get back with me if you have trouble.
     
  6. Nov 21, 2011 #5
    Thanks a lot for your help. i was able to find a website where a mathematics instructor posted their course notes on DEs and solving DEs with laplace transforms and have gained a much better understanding of laplace transforms in general. I have yet to complete a solution but it does seem like this will be a much easier method than trying to solve without.
     
  7. Nov 21, 2011 #6
    so im working on a solution and i have a question about the step function. lets say that the decaying force is f(t). with u (t-11)= {0 if t< 11, 1 if t>=11}. the function of the force is then
    g(t)=(1-u(t-11))* f(t)

    or g(t)=f(t)-[u(t-11)*f(t)]

    as i understand it. in order to do the laplace transform f(t) has to be in the form f(t-11) so:

    g(t)= f(t) - u(t-11)*f(t-11+11)

    from here how would i proceed. i assume that i can take the laplace of f(t) + the transform of [u(t-11)*f(t-11+11)] how would i find this second transform.
     
  8. Nov 22, 2011 #7

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2011
  9. Nov 23, 2011 #8
    Thanks a lot for your help. It turns out my force function was wrong. It is actually
    F=(t-11)sin^2(pi*t)(U(t)-U(t-11))
    I understand how to solve using laplace now, thanks to you, but this problem started to get quite messy quickly so i ended up solving using a math simulation software to avoid any mistakes. This is an engineering problem i'm working on at university for an industry client.
    Thanks for your help.
     
  10. Nov 23, 2011 #9

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Turned out I had to review this math myself so I got something out of it too! You were smart to use simulation software since it was for a client. But someday you might have to do it analytically!
     
  11. Nov 23, 2011 #10
    Not sure if your interested but after running it through Maple (math software) we got both a numerical and analytical model. The analytical model had to be solved using laplace and it ended up being over 6000 characters (this is with the new force function). This turned out to be quite the differential equation.
     
  12. Nov 24, 2011 #11

    rude man

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Very good. Tough problem on paper -challenging but also edifying. Modern math software is truly remarkable.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook