Forces to crack a pouch after a fall

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the forces exerted on a balloon filled with one liter of water when it falls from a height of one meter. The calculated gravitational potential energy at impact is 9.81 Joules, but the balloon experiences greater risk of cracking upon impact compared to static pressure tests where it withstands up to 2000 Newtons without damage. Dynamic effects, such as strain rate and stress concentrations, significantly influence the balloon's integrity during a fall. The conversation also touches on the hydraulic pressure exerted by the water on the balloon walls and how the balloon's non-rigid structure complicates the impact force calculations. Understanding these factors is essential for assessing the balloon's failure threshold upon impact.
rah
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have a question I need help with.

Im trying to find out how much forces that a pouch (balloon) creates on the inside walls when it hits the floor after a fall.

A pouch (balloon) with one litre of water falls from 1 meter down to the floor.

How much force must the "walls" stand before they crack?

I have tryed to put a known force on top of the pouch and it stands quite a lot.
But when I drop it on the floor it cracks "a lot easier".


R
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rah said:
A pouch (balloon) with one litre of water falls from 1 meter down to the floor.

How much force must the "walls" stand before they crack?

I have tryed to put a known force on top of the pouch and it stands quite a lot.
But when I drop it on the floor it cracks "a lot easier".
1 l of water = 1 kg and 1 m, mgh = 1 kg * 9.81 m/s2 * 1 m = 9.81 J.

Does the static force on top of the balloon apply a for equivalent to 9.8 J?


There are dynamic effects and stress concentrations that play a role. When the balloon drops there is a strain rate effect as well as a non-uniformity in the stress field that can cause the balloon material to tear. Some of the stress non-uniformity will arise from friction between the balloon and impact surface, as well as non-uniformity in the wall of the balloon.
 
Thank you for your quick reply.

If I understood you right the force that the balloon hits the floor with is 9,8J or Newton.

The force I use when I pressure test the pouch is 2000N and the pouch doesent have any sign of cracking.

Is it possible to calculate the pressure the water creates on the walls. Is that hydraulic pressure?

R
 
rah said:
Thank you for your quick reply.

If I understood you right the force that the balloon hits the floor with is 9,8J or Newton.

The force I use when I pressure test the pouch is 2000N and the pouch doesent have any sign of cracking.

Is it possible to calculate the pressure the water creates on the walls. Is that hydraulic pressure?

R
When the balloon drops, the gavitational potential energy converts to kinetic energy until the balloon hits the floor (9.8 J). When the balloon hits the floor, the force is determined by the impulse relationship, but it's complicated since the balloon is not rigid. The water deforms as it collapses and the balloon is pushed out sideways (radially) - and there is probably an acoustic/shock wave reverberating through the water.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top