MHB Forecasting Automotive Sales: Choose the Best Approach for Accurate Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jason000000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Advise Compare
AI Thread Summary
Two automotive companies are exploring forecasting methods for their sales projections. A time series approach is suggested, focusing on seasonality patterns. For the first company, the "moving average" method is recommended due to a sufficient data range, while the "naive" method is proposed for the second company due to its limited data. Metrics like MAD, MSE, and MAPE will be used to evaluate the accuracy of the forecasts. The discussion highlights the challenges of working with small datasets in forecasting scenarios.
Jason000000
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Two automotive companies are trying to forecast the next year sales. They try to select the best approach and tool to make the forecast as accurate as possible. Compare between the different approaches of forecasting and advise by return the one you suggest, and mention why did not you use the other

Year 1st company sales ( In millions) Month 2nd company sales( In millions)
2010 22 October 2017 42
2011 11 November 2017 47
2012 35 December 2017 37
2013 49
2014 52
2015 46
2017 50
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Jason000000 said:
Two automotive companies are trying to forecast the next year sales. They try to select the best approach and tool to make the forecast as accurate as possible. Compare between the different approaches of forecasting and advise by return the one you suggest, and mention why did not you use the other

Year 1st company sales ( In millions) Month 2nd company sales( In millions)
2010 22 October 2017 42
2011 11 November 2017 47
2012 35 December 2017 37
2013 49
2014 52
2015 46
2017 50

Hi Jason.

So this is a time series problem most likely. It could be modeled in other ways but usually when we group by calendar month it involves time series. What topic(s) have you covered around this topic? What have you tried? Without some context it's hard to give guidance.
 
Jameson said:
Hi Jason.

So this is a time series problem most likely. It could be modeled in other ways but usually when we group by calendar month it involves time series. What topic(s) have you covered around this topic? What have you tried? Without some context it's hard to give guidance.

Hi Jameson,

yes you are right it's a time series method .. one of many forecast technique ... and my guess it's the seasonality pattern of time series.
The problem is how to apply this seasonal pattern on both companies!

Year...1st company sales ( In millions)
2010.........22
2011.........11
2012.........35
2013.........49
2014.........52
2015.........46
2016.........48
2017.........50

Month......2nd company sales( In millions)
October 2017......42
November 2017......47
December 2017......37appreciate your input Jameson ...
 
Jason000000 said:
Hi Jameson,

yes you are right it's a time series method .. one of many forecast technique ... and my guess it's the seasonality pattern of time series.
The problem is how to apply this seasonal pattern on both companies!

Year...1st company sales ( In millions)
2010.........22
2011.........11
2012.........35
2013.........49
2014.........52
2015.........46
2016.........48
2017.........50

Month......2nd company sales( In millions)
October 2017......42
November 2017......47
December 2017......37appreciate your input Jameson ...

my suggestion is to apply the "moving average" method of forecasting on company 1, and get the usual MAD, MSE & MAPE.
and as for the 2nd company.. due to very limited records I suggest applying the "naive" method. And also get the MAD, MSE & MAPE.

What do you think?
 
Jason000000 said:
my suggestion is to apply the "moving average" method of forecasting on company 1, and get the usual MAD, MSE & MAPE.
and as for the 2nd company.. due to very limited records I suggest applying the "naive" method. And also get the MAD, MSE & MAPE.

What do you think?

Hi Jason,

This is data set is very, very small. Usually for time series we have a minimum of 30 points and ideally more like 100. So I think moving average is reasonable given this constraint. All of those metrics are fine to use. If this is for a course I'm really surprised by the lack of data. In my job we come across this issue sometimes but in a classroom they should try to construct usable data sets. Anyway, what do you get for the moving average? Over how many points do you propose to average?
 
Jameson said:
Hi Jason,

This is data set is very, very small. Usually for time series we have a minimum of 30 points and ideally more like 100. So I think moving average is reasonable given this constraint. All of those metrics are fine to use. If this is for a course I'm really surprised by the lack of data. In my job we come across this issue sometimes but in a classroom they should try to construct usable data sets. Anyway, what do you get for the moving average? Over how many points do you propose to average?

Hey Jameson .. thanks for the input .. i will pass you what I achieved to check it out .. thanx
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
6K
Back
Top