Seydlitz said:
I'm sorry but I just can't resist this. I find your comment makes sense in that top schools tend to see the applicants' achievements and etc, but I do think your post is pretty harsh, especially the last part. I hope you realize that you are patronising the OP.
I saw you have posted several threads yourself asking for academic advise, and I don't think you might appreciate people talking down on you, using capslock and sarcasm to deliver a point.
Meant to help. I've been in his spot before. I was quite neurotic about the whole thing.
It's harsh because the admissions process is harsh. MIT accepts 150 international students per year. Last I checked, that was about 3%.
And as Vanadium implied, no knows what the OP should do to get in. You talk to some people, and they're not sure how they did. You talk to some others, and it quickly makes sense why.
Just to put things into perspective for the OP: I know of somebody who went to Stanford, and that person published two books before. They weren't good books by any stretch, but getting published as a teenager and having people buy your books is a pretty big deal. Another kid I know went to Yale, and that person was heavily involved in politics to the point where he was elected in his hometown.
Somebody else said this before: "You could do all the "right" things and still not get in." It's very important to think about that.
Wanting to go to any arbitrary school, shouldn't be a goal of its own, in my opinion. If you're doing things, do them for the sake of improving yourself. If you go the other way, you'll get a tendency to view everything as "ticking boxes" and "jumping through hoops", and that's when things get more stressful than they should be.
Work hard, improve yourself, and let the chips fall where they may. Don't put all your money on one school, apply broadly. Plenty of good schools to choose from. By the way, OP, I saw someone on physicsgre.com who went to UCT for 4 years, and was accepted for PhDs at Chicago and Columbia.