Formation of the Moon: A Vibrating History

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formation of the Moon and the possibility of it still vibrating from its initial molten state. It is argued that while the Moon does experience librations due to its orbit, it is unlikely to be vibrating significantly as a result of its formation, especially since it is tidally locked to Earth. The idea that the Moon is hollow, based on reverberations detected during Apollo missions, is largely dismissed, with participants pointing out that such vibrations do not imply hollowness. The consensus leans towards the Moon being solid, countering myths surrounding its structure. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of credible sources in debunking misconceptions about the Moon's geology.
verdigris
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
If something hit the Earth billions of years ago and caused a molten blob to be released from it,and this blob settled into a spherical shape,after vibrating a lot,could the moon still be vibrating because of a formation process like this?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I guess it could, but I don't think it is. The moon is tidally locked to the earth, which probably damped-out all of that. The moon does oscillate back and forth (librations), but those are due to the eccentricity of its orbit.
 
Even if completely isolated in space, it seems unlikely such a large coherent vibration would last long before being distributed among other degrees of freedom and ultimately just radiated as heat. Much like the polhode motion of a GP-B gyro.
 
Layman's terms: The Earth absorbs some of the vibrations of the moon, anf the moon is stabilized.
 
verdigris said:
If something hit the Earth billions of years ago and caused a molten blob to be released from it,and this blob settled into a spherical shape,after vibrating a lot,could the moon still be vibrating because of a formation process like this?

The reason I was interested in this thread is because there was some information received during the moon walks and experiments that suggested the moon is hollow. The pings, or whatever method discovered this phenomenon, showed reverberation taking place in the moon's interior reaches.

Was the reverberation incorrectly diagnosed or is the moon actually hollow?
(death star?:devil: )

Some more legit and less legit (majority) references:

http://www.geocities.com/area51/hollow/8827/moonfacts.html

http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=2410

Bad Astronomy: (debunks the idea)

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php?t=18596

This one's right out there:

http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/01jan/moon.html

This one asks "Is the moon hollow or made of swiss cheese"

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread30059/pg1

Here's where the idea may have come from...

"...when the Apollo 13 mission dropped a tank (fuel or oxygen?) on the Moon a seismometer showed that the Moon vibrated for over 3 hours."

http://bigbangblasted.mywowbb.com/forum1/8.html

This could go on indefinitely so I'll stop now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the list baywax. I'll check them out sooner or later.
 
Baywax, it should not be difficult to judge from the credibility of the sources you listed that the correct answer is that the moon is not hollow.

Nothing about the fact that vibrations were detected when a tank was dropped suggests the moon is hollow. IIRC, the Earth reverberated for weeks after that tsunami last year.
 
russ_watters said:
Baywax, it should not be difficult to judge from the credibility of the sources you listed that the correct answer is that the moon is not hollow.

Nothing about the fact that vibrations were detected when a tank was dropped suggests the moon is hollow. IIRC, the Earth reverberated for weeks after that tsunami last year.

Thanks Russ. That probably solves the misconception, myth and waste of energy that's been put into this story.
 
Back
Top