Forming a Basis in R^3 - Explain the Correct Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chadlee88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis
AI Thread Summary
Only one of the given sets of vectors can form a basis for R^3, and the set S = {(1,1,1), (-2,1,1), (-1,2,2)} does not qualify because it lacks linear independence. Specifically, one vector in S can be expressed as a linear combination of the others, which disqualifies the set from being a basis. The discussion highlights the importance of linear independence in forming a basis in R^3. Understanding the relationship between vectors is crucial for determining their ability to span the space. Therefore, identifying which vectors can be expressed as combinations of others is key to solving such problems.
Chadlee88
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
i have a question I am trying to work but I am not sure how to do it. I'm given 4 dirrerent answers to choose from (i won't post them because i want to try them myself)

Only one of the following 4 sets of vectors forms a basis of R3.
Explain which one is, and why, and explain why each of the other sets do not form a
basis.


S = {(1,1,1), (-2,1,1), (-1,2,2)}

This one is not because it cannot be expressed as a linear combination right??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
S is not a basis for R^3 because it is not linearly independent.
 
Chadlee88 said:
i have a question I am trying to work but I am not sure how to do it. I'm given 4 dirrerent answers to choose from (i won't post them because i want to try them myself)

Only one of the following 4 sets of vectors forms a basis of R3.
Explain which one is, and why, and explain why each of the other sets do not form a
basis.


S = {(1,1,1), (-2,1,1), (-1,2,2)}

This one is not because it cannot be expressed as a linear combination right??
Because what "cannot be expressed as a linear combination"?
Grammatically, the "it" in your sentence must refer to "this one", meaning the set of vectors- but it doesn't make sense to talk about expressing a set of vectors as a linear combination of anything.

It is true that S is not a basis for R3 because one of the vectors in S can be expressed as a linear combination of the other two. For example, (1, 1, 1)= -1(-2, 1, 1)+ 1(-1, 2, 2).
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top