Forming a formula from a-b=c-d

  • Thread starter Thread starter khazaymeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The equation a-b=c-d can be rearranged to solve for c, resulting in c=a-b+d, which is correct. The alternative equation c=a/b*d is incorrect and likely stems from a misunderstanding of the original relationship. The only valid transformations of the equation yield variations of c=a-b+d, with different arrangements of the terms. There are six equivalent forms to express c based on the initial equation. Clarity in notation is essential to avoid confusion between subtraction and division.
khazaymeh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am beginner in mathematics , I have the following relationship:

a-b=c-d

I need to calculate c under the assumption that a, b and d are known values.
I got c=a-b+d
and c=a/b*d

can I use any other formulas?!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
khazaymeh said:
Hi, I am beginner in mathematics , I have the following relationship:

a-b=c-d

I need to calculate c under the assumption that a, b and d are known values.
I got c=a-b+d
and c=a/b*d

can I use any other formulas?!

c=a-b+d follows directly from the stated relationship. Where did you get c=a/b*d ?
 
khazaymeh said:
Hi, I am beginner in mathematics , I have the following relationship:

a-b=c-d

I need to calculate c under the assumption that a, b and d are known values.
I got c=a-b+d
What you got above is correct. To solve for c, add d to both sides of the equation.

I don't know how you got the equation below, but it's incorrect.
khazaymeh said:
and c=a/b*d

can I use any other formulas?!
The equation you started with is very simple, so the only possible differences are how the three terms on the other side are arranged, with a total of six ways.

c = a - b + d
c = a + d - b
c = d + a - b
c = d - b + a
c = -b + a + d
c = -b + d + a
 
khazaymeh said:
Hi, I am beginner in mathematics , I have the following relationship:

a-b=c-d

I need to calculate c under the assumption that a, b and d are known values.
I got c=a-b+d
and c=a/b*d

can I use any other formulas?!

c=a-b+d follows from a-b=c-d

c=a/b*d follows from a/b=c/d

Did you write it down in a way that your -'s look like /'s ?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top