MHB How to Form a Quadratic Equation with Coefficients in AP and Integer Roots?

AI Thread Summary
To form a quadratic equation with coefficients in arithmetic progression (AP) and integer roots, set \( a = 1 \) for simplicity. The coefficients \( b \) and \( c \) can be expressed as \( b = 1 + k \) and \( c = 1 + 2k \) for a nonzero integer \( k \). The condition for integer roots, \( b^2 - 4c \), simplifies to \( k^2 - 6k - 3 \) needing to be a perfect square. The first valid \( k \) is 7, leading to the equation \( x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0 \) with integer roots -5 and -3, and the coefficients 1, 8, and 15 in AP. Further exploration is needed to determine systematic ways to choose \( k \) and the existence of infinitely many solutions for \( a \neq 0 \).
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
form a quadratic equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ such that a,b,c are in AP and it has got integer roots
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]
Set $a = 1$ for convenience. Then the quadratic has integer roots if and only if $b^2 - 4c$ is a perfect square. Furthermore we need $a$, $b$ and $c$ to be in arithmetic progression, so we must have $b = 1 + k$ and $c = 1 + 2k$ for some nonzero integer $k$. Thus we need $(1 + k)^2 - 4(1 + 2k) = k^2 - 6k - 3$ to be a perfect square. The first one that works is $k = 7$, since $7^2 - 6 \times 7 - 3 = 4 = 2^2$. Therefore a solution is:
$$x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0$$
Which has integer roots $-5$ and $-3$, and $1$, $8$, $15$ are in arithmetic progression.

TODO: find a systematic way to choose $k$, and prove/disprove there are infinitely many solutions for any $a \ne 0$.​
[/sp]
 
Bacterius said:
[sp]
Set $a = 1$ for convenience. Then the quadratic has integer roots if and only if $b^2 - 4c$ is a perfect square. Furthermore we need $a$, $b$ and $c$ to be in arithmetic progression, so we must have $b = 1 + k$ and $c = 1 + 2k$ for some nonzero integer $k$. Thus we need $(1 + k)^2 - 4(1 + 2k) = k^2 - 6k - 3$ to be a perfect square. The first one that works is $k = 7$, since $7^2 - 6 \times 7 - 3 = 4 = 2^2$. Therefore a solution is:
$$x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0$$
Which has integer roots $-5$ and $-3$, and $1$, $8$, $15$ are in arithmetic progression.

TODO: find a systematic way to choose $k$, and prove/disprove there are infinitely many solutions for any $a \ne 0$.​
[/sp]
[sp]In fact, assuming that $a$, $b$ and $c$ are integers there is only one other solution apart from $x^2 + 8x + 15 = 0$ or multiples of it.

If $a$ and $k$ have a common factor $d$ then $d$ will divide $a$, $b$ and $c$, and we can divide the equation $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ by $d$ to get an equivalent version of the same equation. So we may assume that $a$ and $k$ are coprime. But the sum of the roots (which has to be an integer) is $\frac{-(a+k)}{a} = -1 -\frac ka$. If $a$ and $k$ are coprime that can only be an integer when $a=1$. So the equation becomes $x^2 + (1+k)x + (1+2k)$, with roots $\frac12\bigl( -1-k \pm\sqrt{(k+1)^2 - 4(2k+1)}\bigr).$

The expression under the square root is $k^2 - 6k - 3 = (k-3)^2 - 12$. That has to be the square of some integer $n$. If we write $k-3=m$ then $m$ and $n$ have to satisfy the condition $m^2 - 12 = n^2$. Then $m^2 - n^2 = (m+n)(m-n) = 12.$ The only factorisations of $12$ making $m$ and $n$ both integers are are $12 = (\pm6)(\pm2)$, giving $m = \pm4$ and $n = \pm2.$ If $m=4$ then $k=7$, giving the solution ground by Bacterius. If $m=-4$ then $k=-1$, giving the equation $x^2 + 0x + (-1) = 0$, or $x^2-1=0$, with solutions $x = \pm1.$[/sp]
 
my solution is same as above except the starting point

because the roots are integer say m and n then
$f(x) =l(x+m)(x+n)$

so for the case when gcd( coefficients of $x^2$, coefficients of x, constant) = 1 then coefficient of $x^2 = 1$
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top