Formula for gravitational energy

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
i have looked on the net for a formula that would give me an idea
of how much gravitational energy verses other energies is given
of when a massive body is destroyed, is there such a formula?
or is it just that the mass of the body is converted into energy by
E=M^2 and the gravitational energy that, that the origonal body
exhibited?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea at all what this question means!

What do you mean by "gravitational energy"? Is there any reason to think that the energy contained in a body can be allocated to "gravity", "electricity", etc?

"or is it just that the mass of the body is converted into energy by
E=M^2" Typo here: E= M c^2.

Yes, there is not differentiation into "types" of energy.
 
not very well posed and typos also, maybe if i ask,
if two bodies collied and are totaly destroyed, gravitational
radiation is given out, "hopefully", how would the total amount of this radiation
be measured? i hope this makes more sence.
 
Originally posted by wolram
not very well posed and typos also, maybe if i ask,
if two bodies collied and are totaly destroyed, gravitational
radiation is given out, "hopefully", how would the total amount of this radiation
be measured? i hope this makes more sence.

Huh? If two collide, they are not totally destroyed. If you look at collisions, matter is rearranged, not destroyed.

If you're referring to a matter/antimatter reaction, you should still get gravitation from the cosmic rays that are formed from the colision.
 
significant or not the LIGO project is attempting to detect GRAVITATIONAL
RADIATION, so how are the parameters set, i would WAG that less
than the origonal bodies "potential gravitational energy"
is converted into gravitational radiation, maybe 10% or less,
so has anyone who can understand my ramblings any idea of how
many "ERGs or what ever" of gravitational energy is release
when a mass is converted to energy?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top