Formula for Natural Frequency of Cantilever Beam

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formulas for calculating the natural frequency of a cantilever beam. Participants are examining different versions of the equations and their implications, particularly focusing on the presence or absence of the factor of \(2\pi\) in the formulas. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to the natural frequency and angular frequency.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents two equations for the natural frequency of a cantilever beam, questioning the necessity of the \(2\pi\) factor in one of the formulas.
  • Another participant clarifies the relationship between angular frequency and frequency in Hz, suggesting that the first equation yields frequency in Hz while the second gives it in radians per second.
  • Further contributions reiterate the governing differential equation for a cantilever beam and its solution, linking it to the natural frequency calculations.
  • There is a repetition of the governing equation and its solution, emphasizing the connection to the formulas discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding which version of the frequency formula is correct, indicating a lack of consensus on the necessity of the \(2\pi\) factor. Multiple competing views remain on the interpretation of the equations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in the definitions of frequency and angular frequency, as well as the assumptions underlying the formulas presented. There are unresolved aspects regarding the derivation and application of the equations.

Oscar6330
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I found two different versions of equations to find natural frequency of a cantilever beam. I am not sure which one is right. I would appreciate if someone could make things a bit clear here


F1= k^2*sqrt(E*I/(mpl*L^4))/(2*pi) where k=1.875 for first natural freq and I= b*d^3/12;

OR is it

F1= k^2*sqrt(E*I/(mpl*L^4)) where k=1.875 for first natural freq and I= b*d^3/12;

Basically I am not sure why some equations have /(2*pi) while others do not and which one is correct
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular frequency , \omega radians /second = 2\pif cycles per second ?
 
Studiot said:
Angular frequency , \omega radians /second = 2\pif cycles per second ?

Thanks. So the first equation gives freq in Hz while other one gives answer in radians per second?
 
Yes the solution to the governing differential equation for say a cantilever with mass m at the end is

m\ddot x + kx = 0

which has solution

\omega = \sqrt {\frac{k}{m}}

where omega is in rads/second
 
Last edited:
Studiot said:
Yes the solution to the governing differential equation for say a cantilever with mass m at the end is

m\ddot x + kx = 0

which has solution

\omega = \sqrt {\frac{k}{m}}

where omega is in rads/second

thanks for your kind reply.

So

F1= k^2*sqrt(E*I/(mpl*L^4))/(2*pi)


w1=k^2*sqrt(E*I/(mpl*L^4))
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
928
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K