Fourier series and orthogonality, completeness

  • Thread starter kidsasd987
  • Start date
  • #1
143
4
http://ms.mcmaster.ca/courses/20102011/term4/math2zz3/Lecture1.pdf


On pg 10, the example says f(x)=/=0 while R.H.S is zero. It is an equations started from the assumption in pg 9; f(x)=c0f(x)0+c1f(x)1…, then how do we get inequality?

if the system is complete and orthogonal, then (f(x),ϕ_n(x))=0, which makes sense only when f(x)=0.
but we know for fourier series, we get values for Rhs and Lhs.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
DrClaude
Mentor
7,554
3,894
if the system is complete and orthogonal, then (f(x),ϕ_n(x))=0, which makes sense only when f(x)=0.
That's the key word. The comment on p. 10 is for an arbitrary orthogonal system. That is why completeness is necessary, as explained on p. 11.
 
  • Like
Likes kidsasd987
  • #3
143
4
That's the key word. The comment on p. 10 is for an arbitrary orthogonal system. That is why completeness is necessary, as explained on p. 11.
Could you explain the details?

Also, if (f(x),ϕ_n(x))=0 holds in general for complete series, then fourier series must be also zero since they are complete.



however we know that for signals we do get values within the interval of pi and -pi. is this because what we usually solve for signal input f(t) is not complete?

so we are approximating the signal?
 
  • #4
DrClaude
Mentor
7,554
3,894
Could you explain the details?
Look at p. 12, where an example is given of an orthogonal system that is not complete. Using only cosines, you could never write an expression for e.g. sin(x).

Also, if (f(x),ϕ_n(x))=0 holds in general for complete series, then fourier series must be also zero since they are complete.
But it's the other way around. If ##(f, \phi_n) = 0## for a given ##f(x)## and for all ##\phi_n##, then ##\{\phi_n\}## is not a complete set.

however we know that for signals we do get values within the interval of pi and -pi. is this because what we usually solve for signal input f(t) is not complete?

so we are approximating the signal?
I'm not sure what you are asking here. If the signal is periodic but not on the interval ##[-\pi,\pi]##, then it is trivial to scale/shift it to that interval. If the signal is finite in time, then it is delt with the same way. If the signal is not finite, or only part of it is known, then indeed thre are approximations being made.
 

Related Threads on Fourier series and orthogonality, completeness

Replies
1
Views
744
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
816
Top