Fourier series - correspondence between complex and real coefficients.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the derivation of the relationships between complex coefficients (Cn) and real coefficients (An, Bn) in Fourier series. The user is familiar with the formulas but seeks clarity on the underlying reasoning for these relationships. They mention the standard complex Fourier series representation and the process of separating the constant term and combining terms using Euler's formula. The user is looking for a step-by-step explanation or guidance on deriving these relationships independently. The inquiry highlights a gap in their textbook regarding the derivation process.
theneedtoknow
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I know how to get the full Fourier series with complex coefficients and with real coefficients, and I know the relationship between An, Bn and Cn. However, I don't know why the relationship between them is what is it. Can someone either explain to me where the relationship comes from, or at least point out the steps I need to do in order to derive the relationship myself?

(This is not a homework problem, it's just that my book simply gives me the relationships between Cn, An and Bn, but they do not show how they derived them)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Usual complex Fourier series f(x)=ΣCneinx, with n [-∞,∞]. To get series in terms of cos(nx) and sin(nx), first separate out the n=0 term (constant). Then combine the n term with the -n term, using the fact that cos(nx)={einx+e-inx}/2 and sin(nx)={einx-e-inx}/2i to combine Cn and C-n To get An and Bn.
 
Thank you :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top