Fourier series odd and even functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the representation of odd functions in Fourier series. It is stated that all odd functions can be described by sine series, yet the provided equation includes cosine terms, leading to contradictions. The participants clarify that if the function is defined as sin(φ/2) over [0, 2π], it is treated as even, while defining it over [-π, π] would make it odd. There is also uncertainty about the necessity of the term c^n in the series, with suggestions that it may not serve a purpose. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly identifying the function's symmetry and interval for accurate Fourier series representation.
sommerfugl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello

I'am a little confused. In my textbook it is written that all odd function can be described by a sine series.

I have this following equation from an exercise:

A_{0}+\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty (A_{n} cos(n \phi) + B_{n} sin(n \phi))c^{n} = sin(\dfrac{\phi}{2})

It's a standard Fourier serie, where n and c is positive. T
hen it is written in the solution that B_{n}c^{n} = 0 because of symmetry reasons. And I'am confused because then the Fourier serie only have cosine term and the function on the right hand side is an odd function?!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Off hand I would say you are right. For an odd function the A's should be 0, not the B's. Also if c is a constant, what is the point of cn, since the direct calculation of the coefficients doesn't give them.
 
When you find the Fourier series, you are taking the function to be periodic with period 2\pi.

I think your book is taking the function as \sin \phi/2 on the interval [0, 2\pi] and extending it to be periodic for other values of \phi. That is an even function.

If you defined the function as \sin \phi/2 over the interval [-\pi, \pi], that is a different function which is odd.

It could be that the book forgot to say which of these functions it is talking about.

I agree with #2, I don't see the purpose the c^n (or for c_n, if there was a typo).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top