Fourier transform -- Is this an error in my textbook?

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mad mathematician
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    equation Error math
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a potential error in the textbook "Fundamentals of Wireless Communication" by David Tse and Pramod Viswanath, specifically in the solutions to exercises in Chapter 2. The equation in question is stated as ##F(\omega)=\gamma Q(\omega)+(1-\gamma)F(\omega)Q(\omega)##, which the participants believe is incorrect. The discussion highlights the importance of proofreading academic texts to avoid such mistakes, as they can lead to confusion among readers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their applications in wireless communication.
  • Familiarity with the concepts presented in "Fundamentals of Wireless Communication".
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation used in signal processing.
  • Experience with academic proofreading and editing techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the correct application of Fourier transforms in wireless communication.
  • Examine other sections of "Fundamentals of Wireless Communication" for similar errors.
  • Learn about the importance of proofreading in academic publishing.
  • Explore additional resources on signal processing to reinforce understanding of the topic.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those studying wireless communication, as well as educators and proofreaders involved in academic publishing.

mad mathematician
Messages
138
Reaction score
24
Homework Statement
preparation for exams in EE
Relevant Equations
below
It looks like a mistake, the book writes the following:
1738333226318.png

I believe (2.4) should be: ##F(\omega)=\gamma Q(\omega)+(1-\gamma)F(\omega)Q(\omega)##. I don't understand these pitfalls in books, they don't make someone to proof-read the text?!
I mean besides me the reader... of course. :-D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"The book" is not really a great reference, What book and what page? Jeez
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim mcnamara
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Gavran, mad mathematician, hutchphd and 1 other person
mad mathematician said:
It looks like a mistake
Yes, I think so too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mad mathematician

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K