Fourier Transform (Numerical Analysis)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Scootertaj
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
1. Calculate the finite Fourier transform of order m of the following sequences:

a) uk = 1, 0[itex]\leq[/itex]k[itex]\leq[/itex]N-1
b) uk = (-1)k, 0[itex]\leq[/itex]k[itex]\leq[/itex]N-1 N even
c) uk = k, 0[itex]\leq[/itex]k[itex]\leq[/itex]N-1

2. Homework Equations
Uk = (1/N)[itex]\sum[/itex]uke-2pi*i*k*j/N from j=0 to N-1 ; 0<=k<=N-1

Attempt:
a) First thing that I tried is that [itex]\sum[/itex]x^k = [itex]\frac{1}{1-x}[/itex] but that doesn't seem to get where I want. For example, I know that for a), we get 1 for k=0 and 0 for k[itex]\neq[/itex]0 , but this would give 1/N (1) for k = 0 and I don't know what for any other k.
So, I found a formula that says:
[itex]\sum[/itex]ei*k*j from j = 0 to N-1
={ 0 if e[itex]\neq[/itex]1,
{ N-1 else.

b) wouldn't we get (1/N)[itex]\sum[/itex]-e-2pi*i*k*j/N from j=0 to N-1 ; 0<=k<=N-1 which is the same as part a) ?
c) I think I need to use the idea that [itex]\sum[/itex]k*x^k = [itex]\frac{x}{(1-x)<sup>2</sup>}[/itex]

Obviously, if this formula is valid (I have no idea), then it would give 1 for 0 and 0 for other k for part a) which is correct

Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind I got it