Fourier Transform of this function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the transition from one step to another in calculating the Fourier Transform of a function. Participants clarify that the exponential term e^{-ikx} was not moved outside the integral but rather replaced with its Taylor expansion. There is a consensus that the integral should be approached by completing the square, rather than relying on the Taylor series. The importance of understanding the dependence of variables in the integral is emphasized. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities involved in evaluating integrals related to Fourier Transforms.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
Hi guys, I'm not sure how they got from first step to the second. Did they use integration by parts? I tried but I didn't arrive at the same result..



119ypag.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It appears the power series of e^{-ikx} was used.
 
MisterX said:
It appears the power series of e^{-ikx} was used.

I've thought about that, but the integral is the product of two exponentials, not produt of two integrals:

∫eA.eB dx = ∫ e(A+B) dx



∫eA dx ∫eB dx = [Ʃ(1/r!)Ar] ∫eB dx

I'm not sure why they simply moved the e-ikx out of the integral.
 
It's just the Taylor expansion of the exponential. BTW that's not the easiest way to solve that integral. Try completing the square.
 
unscientific said:
I'm not sure why they simply moved the e-ikx out of the integral.

You can't move it outside because of its dependence on x.
 
dauto said:
You can't move it outside because of its dependence on x.

My point exactly. So what magic did they perform at that step then?
 
They performed no magic :) Actually, that looks like a rather clumsy approach to solve that integral.

They did not bring exp(-ikx) outside the integral. They simply replaced exp(-ikx) with its Taylor expansion. What you want to bring outside the integral are just the Taylor coefficients of the xn terms.

By the way, as you have been suggested by dauto, try instead to complete the square inside the brackets and you'll solve that integral in no time (no Taylor expansion involved). Interpret the terms inside the brackets as:

A^2=\frac{x^2}{2a^2}

2AB= ikx

B^2= \, ?

Try to determine B^2 and then write your integrand as e-(A2 + 2AB + B2-B2) which is equal to e-(A+B)2 eB2

By the way, this thread would have fitted better in Mathematics/Calculus since your question is essentially about the evaluation of an integral.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
829
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K