Apply Fourier Transform to Scanning Results of Metal of Length L

AI Thread Summary
To analyze the noise in the scanning results of a metal piece using Fourier Transform, it is recommended to first gather a larger dataset, ideally at least 50 data points. The Fourier Transform can be applied to extract the magnitude of the signal's frequency components, which helps in understanding the distribution of harmonics and noise. Smoothing the signal with a moving average can effectively isolate the noise component, allowing for further statistical analysis of its properties, such as mean amplitude and variance. Additionally, creating a histogram of the noise can provide insights into its amplitude distribution. The discussion emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between signal and noise for accurate analysis.
hhh79bigo
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I have a range of results from scanning a piece of metal of length L. The results from the scan are %FSH of the oscilloscope. I have to analyse the noise of the signal and thought I'd do this using a Fourier transform. Using the range of results as follows could you please tell me how I can apply Fourier to this?

Length RESULT
1---------0
2---------0
3---------0
4---------5
5---------0
6---------8
7---------0
8---------20
9--------- 0
10-------- 3
11---------0
12---------3
13---------5
14---------0
15---------65

Thankyou in advance

hhh79bigo
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Data Points

I would try to obtain more data points if possible (50 minimum). Especially since you are trying to analyze noise. I would also suggest taking the magnitude of the Fourier components (Periodogram) instead of using a FFT. A(f) = \frac{2}{N} \cdot \sum\limits_{t = 0}^{n - 1} {x_t \cdot \cos (2 \cdot \pi \cdot f \cdot t)} and B(f) = \frac{2}{N} \cdot \sum\limits_{t = 0}^{n - 1} {x_t \cdot \sin (2 \cdot \pi \cdot f \cdot t)}. The magnitude is given by I\left| f \right| = \sqrt {\left[ {A(f)^2 } \right] + \left[ {B(f)^2 } \right]}. What kind of information will you gain concerning the noise by looking at the signals spectrum? In a sense the spectrum is simply the distribution of harmonics in the signal. If you are interested I can tell you how to extract all the noise out of the signal and analyze it.
 
Last edited:
Yes that would be great.

(By the way the info given is not the real results because the real results are classified!)
 
Yes that would be great.

(By the way the info given is not the real results because the real results are classified!)

I need to be able to see if they are indicative of noise!

Thanks
 
Signal Decomposition

If you just look at the signals spectrum it will hard to distinguish between harmonics from the noise and signal. Signals can be decomposed into typical two components. They are others but they are immaterial to this purpose. You can smooth a signal by using a moving average (see the link below). This process will remove all the noise from the original signal. The smoothed signal is know as the trend component. After you have removed the noise you must subtract the smoothed sequence of numbers from the original sequence of numbers. This will leave you with noise component of the signal. Once you have the noise component you can then run statistical test on the noise to determine properties of the noise and categorize what type of noise it is. Use a histogram to determine the distribution of amplitudes of the noise once you done that you can find the mean amplitude, variance of the noise, etc. You can also take the periodogram of the noise and normalize to it look at the distribution of frequencies. You can then analyze statistical properties also such as mean frequency percentage of frequencies bound in a region on the spectrum. If you are a MathCAD user I have created worksheets for this stuff. If you email me I will send it to you.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MovingAverage.html

On a second note. I know all about the classified thing. I have to walk through a metal detector, bomb detector, send all my hand carried items through a X-ray, and I even have to get my coffee cup scanned ever morning.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top