MHB Frank Rodgriguez's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a solid of revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Solid
AI Thread Summary
To find the volume of the solid obtained by revolving the region enclosed by y = xe^x, y = 0, and x = 1 about the x-axis, the disk method is utilized. The volume is expressed as V = π∫(0 to 1) x^2e^(2x) dx. By applying integration by parts twice, the final volume is calculated as V = (π/4)(e^2 - 1). The discussion also notes that using the shell method is complicated due to the need for the Lambert-W function. This solution provides a clear approach to solving the problem effectively.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Find the volume of the solid obtained by revolving the region enclosed by y = xe^x , y = 0 and x = 1?

About the x-axis. I am having a hard time with this problem. My professor says the answer should be pi/2 (e^2 - 1). He also mentions that he could be wrong. Can someone please show me HOW to solve this problem?

Here is a link to the question:

Find the volume of the solid obtained by revolving the region enclosed by y = xe^x , y = 0 and x = 1? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Frank Rodriguez,

The first thing I like to do is plot the region to be revolved:

Let's use the disk method. The volume of an arbitrary disk is:

$$dV=\pi r^2\,dx$$

where:

$$r=y=xe^x$$

and so we have:

$$dV=\pi x^2e^{2x}\,dx$$

Summing the disks by integration, we then have:

$$V=\pi\int_0^1 x^2e^{2x}\,dx$$

To evaluate this definite integral, let's try integration by parts:

$$u=x^2\,\therefore\,du=2x\,dx$$

$$dv=e^{2x}\,dx\,\therefore\,v=\frac{1}{2}e^{2x}$$

and so we have:

$$\frac{V}{\pi}=\left[\frac{1}{2}x^2e^{2x} \right]_0^1-\int_0^1 xe^{2x}\,dx$$

$$\frac{V}{\pi}=\frac{1}{2}e^{2}-\int_0^1 xe^{2x}\,dx$$

Now, using integration by parts again:

$$u=x\,\therefore\,du=dx$$

$$dv=e^{2x}\,dx\,\therefore\,v=\frac{1}{2}e^{2x}$$

and we have:

$$\frac{V}{\pi}=\frac{1}{2}e^{2}-\left(\left[\frac{1}{2}xe^{2x} \right]_0^1-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1 e^{2x}\,dx \right)$$

$$\frac{V}{\pi}=\frac{1}{2}e^{2}-\left(\frac{1}{2}e^{2}-\frac{1}{4}\left[e^{2x} \right]_0^1 \right)$$

$$V=\frac{\pi}{4}\left(e^{2}-1 \right)$$

Normally, if practical, I like to also use the shell method to check my work, however solving $y=xe^x$ for $x$ requires the use of the Lambert-W function, and so we shall leave it at that.

To Frank Rodgriguez and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other calculus problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top