Free Body Diagram of Mass-Spring System

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the free-body diagram of a mass-spring system involving two masses, where mass 1 moves with an initial velocity and mass 2 is stationary but free to move. After the collision, the spring compresses by length ##x##, exerting a force of magnitude ##kx## on both masses. Participants clarify that free-body diagrams are essential for illustrating all forces acting on the masses, including vertical forces, and are not limited to static cases. The role of free-body diagrams is to aid in determining net forces and torques in dynamic situations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with free-body diagrams
  • Knowledge of spring force calculations (Hooke's Law)
  • Basic concepts of dynamics and kinematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Hooke's Law in dynamic systems
  • Learn about vector summation in free-body diagrams
  • Explore the relationship between forces and acceleration using ##\vec F_{\text{net}}=m\vec a##
  • Investigate the role of free-body diagrams in both static and dynamic analyses
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as engineers and educators involved in teaching dynamics and force analysis.

chaneth8
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Draw the Free
Relevant Equations
##F = -kx##
Screenshot 2024-06-30 at 1.25.09 PM.png

Suppose we are given the 2 following masses 1 and 2, where 1 initially moves at velocity ##v_\rm{1}## and 2 is stationary. Note, however, that 2 is not bolted down to any surface - it is free to move around after collision. What would the free-body force diagram of masses 1 and 2 be, after they collide?

This is what I think it will be - I just want to check because I'm not 100% sure.

Suppose the spring is compressed by length ##x## from its relaxed position after collision. Then the force pushing block 1 to the left is the spring force of magnitude ##kx##:
Screenshot 2024-06-30 at 2.28.04 PM.png


Similarly, from the perspective of block 2, the spring is compressed by by length ##x## too, so it will push block 2 to the right by a force of magnitude ##kx##:
Screenshot 2024-06-30 at 2.28.06 PM.png

The reason I'm not sure if this is correct is because block 2 is allowed to move around - is the only force that is pushing block 2 to the right the spring force, or are there more forces?

I'd appreciate any guidance to this problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagrams are correct for the horizontal forces acting on the blocks. However, to make the diagrams complete, you should show all of the vertical forces also.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chaneth8
I was under the impression that free-body diagrams are only used in static cases to depict all applied forces summing up to equilibrium.
 
apostolosdt said:
I was under the impression that free-body diagrams are only used in static cases to depict all applied forces summing up to equilibrium.
I'm not.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
haruspex said:
I'm not.
On second thought, you're most probably right; the role of a free-body diagram is to show only the essential parts of the situation. Thank you for correcting me.
 
apostolosdt said:
I was under the impression that free-body diagrams are only used in static cases to depict all applied forces summing up to equilibrium.
Free body diagrams are used as aids to determine the vector summation on left-hand side of ##\vec F_{\text{net}}=m\vec a## or ##\vec{\tau}_{\text{net}}=I\vec{\alpha}.## In cases where the acceleration (linear or angular) is not known, the vector sum on the left-hand side determines whether the right-hand is or is not zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
2K