Free Body Diagram of Mass-Spring System

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the free-body diagram of a mass-spring system involving two masses, where one mass is initially in motion and the other is stationary but free to move after a collision. After the collision, the spring compresses by a length x, exerting a spring force of magnitude kx on both masses, pushing mass 1 to the left and mass 2 to the right. There is uncertainty about whether additional forces act on mass 2 due to its ability to move. Participants clarify that free-body diagrams are useful for illustrating all forces acting on a body, not just in static situations, and are essential for analyzing dynamics through net force equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of including all relevant forces in the diagrams for accurate analysis.
chaneth8
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Draw the Free
Relevant Equations
##F = -kx##
Screenshot 2024-06-30 at 1.25.09 PM.png

Suppose we are given the 2 following masses 1 and 2, where 1 initially moves at velocity ##v_\rm{1}## and 2 is stationary. Note, however, that 2 is not bolted down to any surface - it is free to move around after collision. What would the free-body force diagram of masses 1 and 2 be, after they collide?

This is what I think it will be - I just want to check because I'm not 100% sure.

Suppose the spring is compressed by length ##x## from its relaxed position after collision. Then the force pushing block 1 to the left is the spring force of magnitude ##kx##:
Screenshot 2024-06-30 at 2.28.04 PM.png


Similarly, from the perspective of block 2, the spring is compressed by by length ##x## too, so it will push block 2 to the right by a force of magnitude ##kx##:
Screenshot 2024-06-30 at 2.28.06 PM.png

The reason I'm not sure if this is correct is because block 2 is allowed to move around - is the only force that is pushing block 2 to the right the spring force, or are there more forces?

I'd appreciate any guidance to this problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagrams are correct for the horizontal forces acting on the blocks. However, to make the diagrams complete, you should show all of the vertical forces also.
 
I was under the impression that free-body diagrams are only used in static cases to depict all applied forces summing up to equilibrium.
 
apostolosdt said:
I was under the impression that free-body diagrams are only used in static cases to depict all applied forces summing up to equilibrium.
I'm not.
 
haruspex said:
I'm not.
On second thought, you're most probably right; the role of a free-body diagram is to show only the essential parts of the situation. Thank you for correcting me.
 
apostolosdt said:
I was under the impression that free-body diagrams are only used in static cases to depict all applied forces summing up to equilibrium.
Free body diagrams are used as aids to determine the vector summation on left-hand side of ##\vec F_{\text{net}}=m\vec a## or ##\vec{\tau}_{\text{net}}=I\vec{\alpha}.## In cases where the acceleration (linear or angular) is not known, the vector sum on the left-hand side determines whether the right-hand is or is not zero.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
30
Views
2K