Freezing water of different starting temp.

  • Thread starter Thread starter feyn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Freezing Water
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the freezing of water at different starting temperatures, participants explore the Mpemba effect, where hotter water can freeze faster than colder water. One explanation involves the greater evaporation rate of hot water, leading to a reduction in the volume that needs to freeze. However, some argue that smaller volumes of water may not freeze as quickly due to overcooling effects, which contradicts the assumption that less water always freezes faster. Experimental observations indicate that larger drops of water tend to freeze before smaller ones, challenging conventional beliefs about freezing dynamics. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities and nuances of the freezing process in relation to temperature and volume.
feyn
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I have questions to a classic experiment : you have 2 equal containers filled with water. IN one the temperature of the water is 98° Celsius, in the other the water has 25° Celsius. If you put both in the freezer the one with the hotter water freezes first.
Now i do understand that one looses its temperature quicker due to the evaporating water (hotter water evaporates more then lukewarm water), but at some point both will have the same temperature, so why is one still loosing its temperature quicker ? Is it cause it has lost more water, so there is less to freeze ? So little water can´t have that much consequences, can it ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Go to: http://www2.binghamton.edu/physics/docs/Royal%20Society%20Mpemba%20effect%20Final%20%2010%20Aug%2012%20%201.pdf

for the answer.

Blue Spruce
 
If you have 2 recipees, one with say 100 ml of water and the other with 90 ml of water at the same temperature and you start to freeze them. It is not obvious at all that the 90 ml will freeze first. I've noticed that the fewer amount of water you have, the lesser it will reach in temperature before freezing (overcooling). I could never avoid over cooling (even with vibrations) when freezing water.
This could imply that evaporation of water actually enlarge the time it will take for the water to freeze. (I did not test for high temperatures).
For very small drops of water, I could go as low as -17°C easily without them to freeze. In fact I could not get them to freeze at 0°C or even close to it. The bigger drops would freeze before the smaller ones (around -4°C was common).
This effect is something I've never read when reading about the Mpemba effect. On the contrary, they all seemed to assume that a lesser quantity of water would freeze before a greater quantity. So they say that evaporation helps the hot water to freeze before the colder water. Well, I do not trust this at all. I've played enough in the lab with water and I'm sure that this is wrong. :smile:
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top