Frequency of string and tuning fork

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 2K views
somecelxis
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



can someone teach me on this question? i really don't know how to start with it. the ans is 0.38m and 4.1N

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



the working is in the second photo
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20140804_071516[1].jpg
    IMG_20140804_071516[1].jpg
    25.3 KB · Views: 531
  • IMG_20140805_015031[1].jpg
    IMG_20140805_015031[1].jpg
    23.3 KB · Views: 545
Physics news on Phys.org
There seems to be some text missing from the question. The second sentence is incomplete. It reads "When ... and ... ". The reader expects some statement of what happens under those conditions, such as "a beat frequency of <some number> Hz is heard", but the sentence abruptly ends.
 
I didn't see any discontinuity. Maybe the OP corrected the image?

EDIT: NM I see your point. The wording is horrible. The problem is not fully stated no matter how you rearrange the given data. The tuning fork frequency is obviously needed. The 3 Hz is a beat, not the tuning fork frequency. Etc.
 
Last edited:
rude man said:
I didn't see any discontinuity. Maybe the OP corrected the image?

EDIT: NM I see your point. The wording is horrible. The problem is not fully stated no matter how you rearrange the given data. The tuning fork frequency is obviously needed. The 3 Hz is a beat, not the tuning fork frequency. Etc.

why The 3 Hz is a beat, not the tuning fork frequency?
 
somecelxis said:
why The 3 Hz is a beat, not the tuning fork frequency?

Well, for one thing you couldn't hear a 3 Hz tuning fork.
For another, the problem is horribly badly described so I made a guess that the 3 Hz is intended to be a beat frequency and the tuning fork frequency was omitted.
 
rude man said:
Well, for one thing you couldn't hear a 3 Hz tuning fork.
For another, the problem is horribly badly described so I made a guess that the 3 Hz is intended to be a beat frequency and the tuning fork frequency was omitted.

why I couldn't hear 3hz tuning fork?
 
somecelxis said:
why I couldn't hear 3hz tuning fork?

The lowest frequency that humans can hear is about 20Hz.

You can see something vibrating at 3Hz if the amplitude is big enough. But a "tuning fork" that vibrated at 3 Hz would be about 1m long, which is nonsense.