Frequency Shift Key Modulation: how are the carrier frequencies chosen

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the selection of carrier frequencies in frequency shift key modulation (FSK), particularly in binary cases. Participants explore the implications of different choices for carrier frequencies, their relationship to modulation bandwidth, and the potential for frequency overlap.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to choose two distinct carrier frequencies for FSK modulation, noting concerns about bandwidth minimization and spectral overlap.
  • Another participant suggests that the carrier frequency is generally much higher than the modulation bandwidth, implying that multiple cycles of each frequency are used for encoding.
  • A participant raises the idea that if multiple signal levels are used (not just binary), the carrier frequencies may not need to be multiples of one another, but this is debated.
  • One participant argues against using carrier frequencies that are multiples of each other for orthogonality reasons, indicating a preference for distinct frequencies.
  • Another participant mentions that FSK typically shifts between two frequencies and that the frequency difference is constrained by the bandwidth of the equipment used.
  • There is a suggestion that care must be taken in shaping the data signal to avoid unintended frequencies, linking this to broader modulation concepts like AM and FM.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the selection of carrier frequencies, particularly regarding whether they should be multiples of one another and how they relate to different signal levels. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding and the complexity of modulation theory, suggesting that further reading may be beneficial for deeper insights.

Master1022
Messages
590
Reaction score
116
TL;DR
How are the two carrier frequencies for FSK modulation chosen?
Question:
For frequency shift key modulation in the binary case, how are the two carrier frequencies chosen?

From online reading, I have seen that the carriers are chosen to be different but also with the goal of minimising bandwidth and without any overlaps of the spectra, etc.

However, I have been told by a tutor that we ought to choose one carrier frequency and then multiply that value by one of the amplitudes of the wave to get the other carrier. However, I have looked on the internet (where I cannot find much clear information about this) and cannot find any source to support this statement. This suggestion runs into issues when there is a 0 amplitude (perhaps an offset would fix that) and a -1 amplitude, the latter of which leads to a case where the two carriers aren't distinct and the frequency spectra would overlap?
For example, if we had a pulse signal that was +1, -1, +1, -1, +1, -1, ... and we wanted to modulate it onto a cosine wave then, according to this suggestion, the points where the pulse changed levels would not lead to any difference in the cosine wave as ## cos(\omega_c t) = cos(-\omega_c t)##. Choosing two distinct carrier frequencies seems to make more sense to me in such a scenario.

I would appreciate any guidance and/or clarification regarding this topic.

For context, I have only been exposed to these concepts at an introductory level (i.e. undergraduate)

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Engineering news on Phys.org
Master1022 said:
Summary:: How are the two carrier frequencies for FSK modulation chosen?

For example, if we had a pulse signal that was +1, -1, +1, -1, +1, -1, ... and we wanted to modulate it onto a cosine wave then, according to this suggestion, the points where the pulse changed levels would not lead to any difference in the cosine wave.
The carrier frequency is generally much higher than the modulation bandwidth. You will have a number of cycles of each frequency to indicate the 0/1 BFSK encoding. Does that help?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
berkeman said:
The carrier frequency is generally much higher than the modulation bandwidth.
Understood

berkeman said:
You will have a number of cycles of each frequency to indicate the 0/1 BFSK encoding. Does that help?
Are the carrier frequencies usually chosen irrespective of the different levels. So if we had levels 0, 1, 2, 3 (I realize this is no longer binary) then is it correct to say that the carrier frequencies won't necessarily be chosen in such a way as to make them all multiples of one another in that same ratio?
 
Master1022 said:
UnderstoodAre the carrier frequencies usually chosen irrespective of the different levels. So if we had levels 0, 1, 2, 3 (I realize this is no longer binary) then is it correct to say that the carrier frequencies won't necessarily be chosen in such a way as to make them all multiples of one another in that same ratio?
I don't think you'd ever want the FSK frequencies to be multiples of each other, for orthogonality reasons. But modulation theory is an amazingly broad subject, so who knows.

I think you will enjoy reading through this link and its reference links. This is a more advanced version of modulation that should hopefully address some of the good questions you are asking yourself:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonal_frequency-division_multiplexing
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Master1022
Any FSK I've had any experience with simply shifts back and forth between two frequencies. This width of this signal (amount shifted) will increase as the bit rate increases. Great care is taken to shape the data signal so as to not make other frequencies than intended. Study up on AM and FM and you will understand.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Strictly speaking there is only one carrier, that shifts between two frequencies.

Where FSK is passed over a voice channel, which is usually the case, the frequency difference is limited by the bandwidth of the equipment used.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K