Frequency shift of light between observers in Schwarzschild space-time

Mentz114
Messages
5,429
Reaction score
292
Considering the simple case of two observers O1 and O2 lying on the same radius at positions r=r1 and r=r2 respectively.

Using a result from Stephani(1) I work out that the ratio of frequencies of light sent radially between these observers is given by this ratio, numerator and denominator evaluated at the points r=r1 and r=r2 respectively,

\frac{\nu_1}{\nu_2} = \frac{(g_{mn}u^m k^n)_1}{(g_{mn}u^m k^n)_2} -------- (1)

where u(i)n is the 4-velocity of O1 and O2 and kn is a null vector defined by the photon trajectory ( up to a constant which will cancel out) so that

k_{m;n}k^n = 0 --------- (2)

which is the geodesic condition for a (transverse ?) plane wave.

We need to find the null vector kn. Because only k0 and k1 are non-zero for a radial photon it is not difficult to solve for k from equation (2), up to a factor, which is all we need. I got the components of kn,

\left(1 - \frac{2M}{r}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}, \left(1 - \frac{2M}{r}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}, 0, 0

which satisfy equ (1) and also gmnkmkn = 0.

Now we can calculate (g_{mn}u^m k^n)_i which gives,

(g_{mn}u^m k^n)_i = u_i^1\left(1-\frac{2M}{r_i}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} - u_i^0\left(1-\frac{2M}{r_i}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}.

Which looks as if it could be right. If the observers are at rest wrt to each other, then we can write ui0 = 1 and ui1 = 0, which reduces equation (1) to the usual gravitational frequency shift.

For u to be a proper 4-vector gmnumun = 1 ( speed of light), so it should be possible to generalise this result a bit more.

If it's correct. This must have been worked out somewhere.



(1) 'General Relativity', Stephani, (Cambridge, 1993).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't had much time for this and resources on the web for geometric optics seem limited. I did notice that my formula derived above,

(g_{mn}u^m k^n)_i = u_i^1\left(1-\frac{2M}{r_i}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}} - u_i^0\left(1-\frac{2M}{r_i}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}

gives the correct SR result for M=0, namely

g_{mn}u^m k^n = u^1 - u^0 = \gamma\beta - \gamma = \gamma(\beta - 1).

The sign is different, but that disappears when we take the ratio.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top