Frequency Stability: What Does 2 Parts in 10E10 Mean?

AI Thread Summary
Frequency stability of a laser described as 2 parts in 10E10 indicates a dimensionless normalized shift of 2 x 10^-10 relative to the central frequency. This means the frequency can vary by 0.02 nm around the mean wavelength. Understanding this terminology is crucial for calculating the actual frequency shift using the central frequency. The discussion clarifies that while the concept of frequency stability is well-known, the specific phrasing can be confusing. Accurate interpretation of this stability metric is essential for applications relying on precise laser frequencies.
Stu165
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know what it means to say that the frequency stability of a laser is 2 parts in 10E10, I gather that it means that the frequency shifts 0.02nm each side of the mean wavelength. But I can't find any resources that use the term parts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The shift is usually expressed as a normalised shift w.r.t. the central laser frequency.

\frac{\Delta\nu}{\nu_0}

This quantity is dimensionless and thus has no units.

Claude.
 
I know that equation and all the coherence stuff, it's just the terminology of 2 parts in 10e10, has thrown me and how to get the shift from that.
 
Well,

\frac{\Delta\nu}{\nu_0} = 2 \times 10^{-10}

If you know the central frequency of the laser, you can figure out the exact amount of shift.

Claude.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top