Fresnel Equations | Refractive Index Interface

  • Thread starter Thread starter xiaoipower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fresnel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Fresnel equations at a refractive index interface, specifically for a normal plane wave polarized in the x-plane. The user presents their understanding of the wave components for z>0 and z<0, identifying the incident, reflected, and transmitted components. They seek clarification on whether to add or subtract the incident and reflected terms for z>0, given that they travel in opposite directions. The response emphasizes that the coefficients for reflection and transmission should be determined by applying boundary conditions at the interface, a concept covered in standard electrodynamics and optics textbooks. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately modeling wave behavior at material boundaries.
xiaoipower
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!

Was wondering if anyone was confident with Fresnel equations for a refractive index interface. From what I understand:

Assume incoming normal plane wave traveling in z-direction and polarised in x plane.

Assume z=0 is the plane that separates two materials: n_1 and n_2 (refractive index)

I think the Fresnel solution for the wave should go:

Ex = (for z>0) exp(-i*k0*n_1*z)+r*exp(i*k0*n_1*z)

(for z<0) t*exp(-i*k0*n_2*z)

the RED term representing the normal incident component and the GREEN term represents the reflected component which only exist in the n_1 half

and the BLUE term representing the transmitted component which only exists in the n_2 half.

I am uncertain about if I should be adding both the incident and reflected term (for z>0) as long as they are traveling in different directions or if I need to subtract them. i.e. should it be RED+GREEN or RED-GREEN? As I already have defined them to travel in opposite directions.

Any thoughts?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You find the coefficients by solving for the boundary conditions at the surface between the two media. This can be found in any textbook on electrodynamics or optics.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top