Fresnel Equations | Refractive Index Interface

  • Thread starter Thread starter xiaoipower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fresnel
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of Fresnel equations at a refractive index interface, specifically for a normal plane wave polarized in the x-plane. The user presents their understanding of the wave components for z>0 and z<0, identifying the incident, reflected, and transmitted components. They seek clarification on whether to add or subtract the incident and reflected terms for z>0, given that they travel in opposite directions. The response emphasizes that the coefficients for reflection and transmission should be determined by applying boundary conditions at the interface, a concept covered in standard electrodynamics and optics textbooks. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately modeling wave behavior at material boundaries.
xiaoipower
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys!

Was wondering if anyone was confident with Fresnel equations for a refractive index interface. From what I understand:

Assume incoming normal plane wave traveling in z-direction and polarised in x plane.

Assume z=0 is the plane that separates two materials: n_1 and n_2 (refractive index)

I think the Fresnel solution for the wave should go:

Ex = (for z>0) exp(-i*k0*n_1*z)+r*exp(i*k0*n_1*z)

(for z<0) t*exp(-i*k0*n_2*z)

the RED term representing the normal incident component and the GREEN term represents the reflected component which only exist in the n_1 half

and the BLUE term representing the transmitted component which only exists in the n_2 half.

I am uncertain about if I should be adding both the incident and reflected term (for z>0) as long as they are traveling in different directions or if I need to subtract them. i.e. should it be RED+GREEN or RED-GREEN? As I already have defined them to travel in opposite directions.

Any thoughts?

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You find the coefficients by solving for the boundary conditions at the surface between the two media. This can be found in any textbook on electrodynamics or optics.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
912
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
874
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
24K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K