Friction in a hemispherical bowl

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter f todd baker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a point mass sliding with friction in a hemispherical bowl, utilizing the equations of motion and frictional forces. The key equations derived include -μN + mgcosθ = ma and N = mgsinθ + mv²/R, where θ is the angle from the horizontal and R is the radius. An approximate solution for small friction coefficients (μ) is provided, leading to the speed at the bottom being v ≈ √(2gR(1-3μ)). The critical friction coefficient where the mass stops is identified between 0.603 and 0.605.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with frictional forces (f = μN)
  • Basic knowledge of differential equations
  • Concept of energy conservation in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for non-linear systems
  • Learn about energy loss calculations in mechanical systems
  • Explore numerical simulation techniques for dynamic systems
  • Investigate the effects of varying friction coefficients on motion
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of motion with friction in curved surfaces.

f todd baker
Messages
61
Reaction score
22
I have been trying to find the speed of a point mass sliding with friction (f=μN) in a hemispherical bowl. Start at the top at rest. So far I have -μN+mgcosθ=ma and N=mgsinθ+mv2/R where θ is the angle below horizontal from the center of the sphere and R is the radius of the sphere. I know it likely does not have a simple solution but would be happy with an approximate solution for small μ.
Capture.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For an exact solution you'll have to solve a differential equation.

For an approximation for small μ, you can calculate the speed without friction, then determine friction and energy loss based on that speed, then calculate a new speed based on the initial value and the energy loss. That gives an easier integral instead of a differential equation.
 
Right you are, and as I see it there are two coupled second-order, nonlinear equations. Good idea to use v(θ,μ)≈v((θ,0) to calculate energy lost. I'll try it.
 
I think the suggestion by mfb was a good one. Using the frictionless v(θ)=√(2gRsinθ) I find v≈√(2gR(1-3μ)) at the bottom. For comparison, a path on a 450 incline with the same drop has v=√(2gR(1-μ)).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb and berkeman
Out of curiosity, I simulated the setup. With μ=0.001 and m=R=g=1 I got E=0.99701, in agreement with your result. μ=0.01 leads to E=0.9704. Even with μ=0.1, the approximation is not bad: E=0.732.

The mass stops at the center for μ>0.60. Tested with 100, 200 and 500 steps: The critical value is somewhere between 0.603 and 0.605. There is no obvious mathematical constant in that range.
 
This is beautiful. I will post your results on my web site. (I have had my wrist slapped here before by mentioning it explicitly, so will not give you the exact link!) I will link back here so that you will be properly acknowledged. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K