Friction - Influence of mass with elastic materials

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the influence of mass on friction when testing four different floor materials against metal: a polyurethane-coated sports surface, a fabric-topped floor tile, foam, and wood. The results indicate that for the sports surface and floor tile, the Coefficient of Friction (CoF) is higher with lower weights, remaining constant as weight increases. The foam exhibited a CoF that varied slightly with weight, while the wood showed minimal change. The conversation suggests that Amonton's Second Law may be relevant, but emphasizes the need for a controlled experimental setup to draw definitive conclusions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coefficient of Friction (CoF)
  • Familiarity with Amonton's Laws of Friction
  • Basic knowledge of experimental physics and measurement techniques
  • Experience with material properties and surface interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the impact of surface roughness on Coefficient of Friction
  • Learn about static vs. dynamic friction measurements
  • Explore controlled experimental design in friction studies
  • Research the effects of material aging and cleanliness on friction coefficients
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in physics, materials scientists, and engineers interested in friction dynamics and surface interactions will benefit from this discussion.

YeeHaa
Messages
28
Reaction score
4
Hi,

I'm doing some research on friction, and I did some tests with 4 different types of floor.
Now the first of these four floors is a sport surface (it has a polyurethane top coat), the second one is a floor-tile (with fabric on top), the third one a piece of foam and the fourth a piece of wood.

All of these materials were tested against metal.

Now I tested every floor with 3 different weights, and took some measurements (measured the normal force and friction force).
When I look at the Coefficient of Friction, it seems that for the first two floors (sport surface and floor tile), the Coefficient of Friction is LARGER when the weight is SMALLER. As soon as I increase the weight (2nd and 3rd weight), the Coefficient of Friction stays the same (it's the same for both weights).

Could this have to do with Amonton's Second Law? Maybe less weight means the surface deformes little.. (but in my eyes this would mean that friction should be lower), and with a lot of weight more of the surface at microscopic level touches the metal?

Some numbers:
Sport surface - metal:
Weight 1: (about 9 kg): CoF = 0.27
Weight 2: (about 15 kg): CoF = 0.19 (+/-)
Weight 3: (about 25 kg): CoF = 0.19 (+/-)

Floor tile - metal (same as sport surface, guess that's coincidence)
Weight 1: (about 9 kg): CoF = 0.27
Weight 2: (about 15 kg): CoF = 0.19 (+/-)
Weight 3: (about 25 kg): CoF = 0.19 (+/-)

Foam - metal:
Weight 1: (about 9 kg): CoF = 0.42
Weight 2: (about 15 kg): CoF = 0.43 (+/-)
Weight 3: (about 25 kg): CoF = 0.41 (+/-)

Wood - metal:
Weight 1: (about 9 kg): CoF = 0.11
Weight 2: (about 15 kg): CoF = 0.12(+/-)
Weight 3: (about 25 kg): CoF = 0.11(+/-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
You haven't given enough about the experimental setup to even speculate about the cause. Some basic missing facts are

* Were you measuring static or dynamic friction?
* What was the geometry of the moving object and how was it loaded with weights? (we don't know if the pressure between the surfaces was uniform across the whole contact area or not).
* How did you apply the force to overcome friction? (i.e. where did you apply the force to the object and were you pushing or pulling? Is it possible it was trying to tip over and "dig into" the floor before it started moving?

But there's no guarantee you will get any useful answers even with that information. The experiment is probably too uncontrolled to "explain" anything in much detail. When you say "a sports floor with a polyurethane top coat" we don't know whether it is newly laid or 10 years old, how smooth it is, how clean it is, whether it has been polished with anything that might act as a lubricant or an adhesive, etc, etc...

If you really want to figure out "exactly" what is happening, you have to control all those types of factors, and/or vary them to investigate what effect they might have.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K