Friction loss is significant in short pipe

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the significance of friction loss in short versus long pipes, specifically addressing the entrance effect. The friction loss formula, f(L/D)(V^2)/2g, indicates that while longer pipes have larger friction losses due to increased length (L), the entrance effect is more pronounced in short pipes. Participants clarify that in short pipes, the friction loss due to entrance effects is significant relative to the overall friction loss, whereas in long pipes, this ratio diminishes, making entrance losses negligible.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with the Darcy-Weisbach equation
  • Knowledge of pipe flow characteristics
  • Basic grasp of hydraulic losses in piping systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Darcy-Weisbach equation in detail
  • Learn about hydraulic entrance losses and their calculations
  • Explore the impact of flow velocity (V) on friction loss
  • Investigate the effects of pipe diameter (D) on flow characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid mechanics students, and professionals involved in pipeline design and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focused on optimizing fluid flow and minimizing hydraulic losses in piping systems.

foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


i was told that the friction loss is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe . However , the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
foo9008 said:

Homework Statement


i was told that the friction loss is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe . However , the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I wouldn't always be so credulous of what "somebody" tells you. Friction loss depends not only on L/D, but also V.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
I wouldn't always be so credulous of what "somebody" tells you. Friction loss depends not only on L/D, but also V.
it was written in a book ... why the friction loss due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe ?
 

Attachments

  • 12.png
    12.png
    90.6 KB · Views: 418
  • DSC_0605.JPG
    DSC_0605.JPG
    72.5 KB · Views: 420
foo9008 said:
it was written in a book ... why the friction loss due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe ?
Well, why do you think this situation would be so?

What is the relative loss due to entrance effect compared with the loss in a section of straight pipe?

Note: Your original post mentioned only friction losses. Now, you are talking about losses due to entrance effects. It's important to disclose all information at the start of a discussion to prevent misunderstandings.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
Well, why do you think this situation would be so?

What is the relative loss due to entrance effect compared with the loss in a section of straight pipe?

Note: Your original post mentioned only friction losses. Now, you are talking about losses due to entrance effects. It's important to disclose all information at the start of a discussion to prevent misunderstandings.
sorry , i mean friction due to entrance effect . why it is negligible in long pipe ? the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?
 
foo9008 said:
sorry , i mean friction due to entrance effect . why it is negligible in long pipe ? the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?
So, if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, what about the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe? Is it a large ratio or a small ratio?
Is the entrance loss affected by the length of the pipe to which it is applied?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
So, if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, what about the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe? Is it a large ratio or a small ratio?
Is the entrance loss affected by the length of the pipe to which it is applied?
if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe woul be small , ?
due to this reason , the friction loss due to entrance effect is negligible ?
 
foo9008 said:
if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe woul be small , ?
due to this reason , the friction loss due to entrance effect is negligible ?

In a long pipe.

How would the friction loss due to the entrance effect compare to the friction loss in a short pipe?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
In a long pipe.

How would the friction loss due to the entrance effect compare to the friction loss in a short pipe?
the friction loss in short pipe is small , so the friction due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe compared to the friction loss in short pipe?
 
  • #10
foo9008 said:
the friction loss in short pipe is small , so the friction due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe compared to the friction loss in short pipe?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K