Friction loss is significant in short pipe

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of friction loss in pipes, particularly comparing short and long pipes. Participants explore the implications of the friction formula and the significance of entrance effects on friction loss.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the relationship between pipe length and friction loss, specifically why friction loss is considered significant in short pipes but not in long pipes. They discuss the role of velocity and the entrance effect in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the relative significance of entrance loss compared to friction loss in different pipe lengths. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of clarifying all relevant factors at the start of the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the definitions and implications of friction loss and entrance effects, as well as the need for clarity in the initial problem statement to avoid misunderstandings.

foo9008
Messages
676
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


i was told that the friction loss is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe . However , the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
foo9008 said:

Homework Statement


i was told that the friction loss is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe . However , the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I wouldn't always be so credulous of what "somebody" tells you. Friction loss depends not only on L/D, but also V.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
I wouldn't always be so credulous of what "somebody" tells you. Friction loss depends not only on L/D, but also V.
it was written in a book ... why the friction loss due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe ?
 

Attachments

  • 12.png
    12.png
    90.6 KB · Views: 427
  • DSC_0605.JPG
    DSC_0605.JPG
    72.5 KB · Views: 427
foo9008 said:
it was written in a book ... why the friction loss due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe , but not so significant in long pipe ?
Well, why do you think this situation would be so?

What is the relative loss due to entrance effect compared with the loss in a section of straight pipe?

Note: Your original post mentioned only friction losses. Now, you are talking about losses due to entrance effects. It's important to disclose all information at the start of a discussion to prevent misunderstandings.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
Well, why do you think this situation would be so?

What is the relative loss due to entrance effect compared with the loss in a section of straight pipe?

Note: Your original post mentioned only friction losses. Now, you are talking about losses due to entrance effects. It's important to disclose all information at the start of a discussion to prevent misunderstandings.
sorry , i mean friction due to entrance effect . why it is negligible in long pipe ? the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?
 
foo9008 said:
sorry , i mean friction due to entrance effect . why it is negligible in long pipe ? the friction formula is given by formula f(L/D)(V^2)/2g , as L is big , friction loss is big . so the friction loss is big , right ?
So, if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, what about the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe? Is it a large ratio or a small ratio?
Is the entrance loss affected by the length of the pipe to which it is applied?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
So, if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, what about the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe? Is it a large ratio or a small ratio?
Is the entrance loss affected by the length of the pipe to which it is applied?
if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe woul be small , ?
due to this reason , the friction loss due to entrance effect is negligible ?
 
foo9008 said:
if the friction loss in a long pipe is relatively large, the ratio of the entrance loss to the friction loss in the long pipe woul be small , ?
due to this reason , the friction loss due to entrance effect is negligible ?

In a long pipe.

How would the friction loss due to the entrance effect compare to the friction loss in a short pipe?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: foo9008
SteamKing said:
In a long pipe.

How would the friction loss due to the entrance effect compare to the friction loss in a short pipe?
the friction loss in short pipe is small , so the friction due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe compared to the friction loss in short pipe?
 
  • #10
foo9008 said:
the friction loss in short pipe is small , so the friction due to entrance effect is significant in short pipe compared to the friction loss in short pipe?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K