Frictionless pully acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two masses, M1 and M2, connected by a string over a frictionless pulley. The original poster attempts to derive an expression for the acceleration of both masses while considering the forces acting on them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on M1 and M2, including gravitational force and tension in the string. There are attempts to establish relationships between these forces and the resulting accelerations of the masses.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning assumptions about the forces involved, particularly the relationship between tension and gravitational force. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of free body diagrams and the application of Newton's second law, but no consensus has been reached on the correct interpretation of the forces.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions regarding static versus dynamic conditions of the masses, as well as the implications of tension in the string. Participants are also navigating the constraints of the problem setup, such as the frictionless conditions and the nature of the forces acting on each mass.

CollegeStudent
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


M1 is on a frictionless flat horizontal surface. It is attached to M2 by a string, which hangs freely from the string which passes over a frictionless pulley of negligible mass. Find a general expression for the acceleration of both M1 and M2. Look at your result and argue that it should be correct.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not really sure how to word this but:

If the mass of M2 is...say .050kg , the force acting on M2 would be the mass of it * gravity. In order to accelerate, M1 would need to have a force act on it that is greater than the mass of M2. If the force pushing M1 was = to the mass of M2 , then M1 would be static.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CollegeStudent said:
M1 would need to have a force act on it that is greater than the mass of M2.
A force cannot be compared (as in greater, less than) to a mass.
Let the tension in the string be T. List the forces acting on each mass and write out the appropriate ƩF=ma equations for each.
 
haruspex said:
A force cannot be compared (as in greater, less than) to a mass.
Let the tension in the string be T. List the forces acting on each mass and write out the appropriate ƩF=ma equations for each.

Okay...so for the hanging M2 we have

ƩF=ma
ƩF=m * g

And M1 has some type of force acting on it that keeps it from rolling back towards M2. (Gravity and normal force are excluded here because there is no vertical acceleration of M1)

That force would be the opposite of the force acting on M2.

That means that the tension of the string connecting the 2...would equal the force pushing M1 foward.

So if tension = the force on M1...and the force of M1 is equal and opposite to the force acting on M2

ƩF = T = mass of M2 * g

If that's true...that would make M1 be static and not moving foward nor backwards...so in order for M1 to accelerate foward...the magnitude of the force acting on M1 would have to be GREATER than the mass of M2 * g.

Does THIS look any better?
 
CollegeStudent said:
Okay...so for the hanging M2 we have

ƩF=ma
ƩF=m * g
No, mg is a force, so it's one part of the ƩF. Let's say the mass of M2 is m2, so the gravitational force here is m2g. What else is in ƩF?
Suppose the system accelerates at rate a; so M2 accelerates down at rate a (while M1 accelerates towards the pulley at the same rate). So the RHS is just m2a.
And M1 has some type of force acting on it that keeps it from rolling back towards M2.
What makes you think that? It will accelerate towards the pulley - there's nothing holding it back.
ƩF = T = mass of M2 * g
No, you must not assume T = m2g. If that were true, there'd be no net force on M2, so no acceleration.
 
haruspex said:
No, mg is a force, so it's one part of the ƩF. Let's say the mass of M2 is m2, so the gravitational force here is m2g. What else is in ƩF?
Suppose the system accelerates at rate a; so M2 accelerates down at rate a (while M1 accelerates towards the pulley at the same rate). So the RHS is just m2a.

And that isn't the same thing as saying the acceleration is going to be the opposite of the mass of M2 times gravity?

haruspex said:
What makes you think that? It will accelerate towards the pulley - there's nothing holding it back.

Right, sorry I wasn't clear...I meant there has to be some force acting on M1 to prevent it from rolling back. Otherwise, yes it will accelerate towards the pulley.

haruspex said:
No, you must not assume T = m2g. If that were true, there'd be no net force on M2, so no acceleration.


Ahh okay...so when tension = the force acting on M2..the 2 objects are static? It just throws me off because...if you have a force reader, (those things you can attach to a string and pull and see the amount of force being applied) wouldn't the forces be equal and opposite? Thus making the tension = to that force?

Then again that makes the string static...okay, back to the original problem...so in order for M1 to accelerate either forwards or backwards the force acting one one side, either M1 or M2 would have to be greater than the force acting on the opposing object?
 
Draw two free body diagrams. The first "body" will be M1, the only force acting on M1 is tension towards the pully. Your second "body" is M2. There are two forces acting on M2, Tension pulling up, and the force due to gravity pulling down.

Now set up equations for both Free body diagrams using Newtons 2nd law. ƩF=ma
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K