- #1
RobinSky
- 112
- 0
I was reading a link i found here on physicsforums called "The relativistic rocket".
There was lots of calculations of the required fuel for certain distances and such.
However, I understand that time→0 when our velocity v→c.
And that will mean we travel a larger distance for a shorter amount of time in our (he/she who travels) frame of reference, right?
During that time though, we are using fuel, so my question is, or maybe I should call this a statement, however. Doesn't this mean that the fuel required to travel a distance d also goes to zero?
Fuel required→0 when v→c because t→0.
I mean, the engine "stops" in it's frame of reference (as time is felt for the engine) when v is c, right? Let's now say it's possible to reach the velocity c.
Let's say v is now (9999999999999/10000000000000)*c. If statement above is true, this velocity will give a very large distance traveled for a minimal used up fuel.
Or is all this nonsense?
Very thanks in advance.
/Robin Andersson
There was lots of calculations of the required fuel for certain distances and such.
However, I understand that time→0 when our velocity v→c.
And that will mean we travel a larger distance for a shorter amount of time in our (he/she who travels) frame of reference, right?
During that time though, we are using fuel, so my question is, or maybe I should call this a statement, however. Doesn't this mean that the fuel required to travel a distance d also goes to zero?
Fuel required→0 when v→c because t→0.
I mean, the engine "stops" in it's frame of reference (as time is felt for the engine) when v is c, right? Let's now say it's possible to reach the velocity c.
Let's say v is now (9999999999999/10000000000000)*c. If statement above is true, this velocity will give a very large distance traveled for a minimal used up fuel.
Or is all this nonsense?
Very thanks in advance.
/Robin Andersson