Fugacity coefficient of an ideal solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter nickelous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the fugacity coefficient of species in an ideal solution, specifically addressing the calculation for species A in a mixture with species B. It clarifies that the mole fraction (xi) should replace the vapor phase fraction (yi) in the fugacity coefficient equation. The physical significance of xAP is linked to the vapor pressure of species A above the liquid components, and its calculation mirrors that of gas mixtures. The fugacity of A in the solution is equated to the fugacity of pure liquid A at the same temperature and pressure, adjusted by its mole fraction. The Poynting correction factor is introduced to account for the difference in free energy due to the liquid's pressure being higher than the equilibrium vapor pressure.
nickelous
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all. I have some confusion regarding the fugacity coefficient of a species in an ideal solution so hoping someone could clear it up for me. According to my textbook, for fugacity coefficient of a species i in a solution:

upload_2014-11-14_2-46-27.png


So if we were talking about an ideal liquid mixture of let's say species A and B, then the denominator yi should be replaced by xi as per stated by the textbook. So if i were to calculate the fugacity coefficient of species A, my question is what is the physical significance of xAP? is it the vapour pressure of the vapour of species A above the liquid components? Why is it calculated in such a way (seems like the same way as how partial pressure of gas mixture is calculated). From what i know, the calculation of vapour pressure of a species in ideal mixture should be xiPo where Po is the vapour pressures of i if it were to exist as pure liquid
 

Attachments

  • upload_2014-11-14_2-45-44.png
    upload_2014-11-14_2-45-44.png
    917 bytes · Views: 664
Physics news on Phys.org
The fugacity of A in an ideal liquid solution is equal to the fugacity of pure liquid A at the same temperature and pressure as the solution times the mole fraction of A in the liquid. As a first approximation to the fugacity of the pure A in the liquid, you use its equilibirum vapor pressure at the solution temperature. This is what would usually go into Raolt's law. But then you need to correct the fugacity because the pressure P of the liquid is higher than the equilibrium vapor pressure of pure A. So you need to consider the change in free energy between the equilibrium vapor pressure and the total pressure. This is where the Poynting correction factor comes in.

Chet
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K