Fukushima Fukushima: Building the Dike, Filling Water, Solution in 5-6 Years

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heating.e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decision
AI Thread Summary
Building a dike around Fukushima and creating an artificial lake to contain water is proposed as a temporary solution for managing radioactive leaks. However, this approach is criticized as unworkable and ineffective, as it does not address the need for ongoing reactor maintenance to prevent further radiation leaks. Concerns are raised about the long-term fate of the radioactive water, which could be absorbed into the ground, undermining containment efforts. The discussion emphasizes the urgency of finding a viable solution within the next 5-6 years. Overall, the proposed measures are deemed insufficient to resolve the underlying issues at Fukushima.
Heating.e
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We build the dike round Fukushima (radius 1-2 km) and filling water. Artificial lake we cover the polyethylene tape on foam plastics buoys (for the delete of gases). For 5-6 years it is possible to find the decision of problem, or to dismantle under water.

Excuse me for my English. I hope I was understood.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is entirely unworkable and doesn't solve the problems anyways. They have to be able to work on the reactors to keep even more radiation from leaking out into the ground, sea water, ETC. And what would we do with all this radioactive water anyways? It's going to get absorbed into the ground, which would defeat the entire purpose of trying to contain the radiation in the first place.
 

Thread 'MCNP6 BURN Card Issue: Zero Burnup for Material in Fuel Assembly'

Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information（power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.） for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
View full post »

Similar threads

Outgassing of CO2 from a lake after lowering the water level
Replies
10
Views
2K
Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States
Replies
9
Views
28K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top