Hi all, hope this is the right forum. Please feel free to move it otherwise:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am confused on whether functional dependence can be determined uniquely by the particulars of a given table, or if it is determined in a more general sense

So I have my relational table. Let A,B be attributes , i.e., different fields. My working definition of B being functionally-dependent on A is that each value of A is associated with exactly one value of B. Now, A may

functionally determine B in a specific table, but not in all tables. So which definition do we use, the one

associated to the specific table, or the more general one?

Specific case:

Now I have in my table the fields OH (On Hand), and the field WN (Warehouse Name) , and in my table, OH determines WN:. In this particular table, there is only one repeated value for OH , the value 8 , specifically, and it happens to be the case that both values 8 are associated with the same warehouse name. In this sense, OH functionally determines WN, since knowing the value of OH uniquely-determines the 'value' WN. But it is absurd to believe this can be generalized: clearly there may be cases where there are the same number of products in two-or-more databases. So, can I then conclude that OH functionally determines WN or not?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Functional Dependence (In Table/General)

Tags:

Loading...

Similar Threads - Functional Dependence Table | Date |
---|---|

Positive-only sigmoid function | Oct 20, 2017 |

Plotting Implicit function of 1 variable | Jun 29, 2017 |

Calculators TI-84 Plus stats as function | Dec 27, 2016 |

Excel: Entering empty cells with function | Oct 8, 2015 |

How can I plot time-dependent wave-functions? | Apr 18, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**