Fundamental quantities and derived quantities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Manish_529
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Units
AI Thread Summary
Length is directly proportional to time in the equation L=Velocity x time, raising questions about its classification as a fundamental quantity. The discussion emphasizes that this classification is based on conventions rather than strict correctness. The seven fundamental physical quantities are not incorrect; they are simply defined according to established conventions. The choice of fundamental quantities depends on the system of units being used. Ultimately, the definitions and conventions shape our understanding of these quantities.
Manish_529
Messages
53
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
If there are only 7 fundamental quantities then how come we can choose the fundamental quantities according to our will like if we take time and speed as fundamental quantities then length is a derived quantity but it's one of the 7 physical quantity so is this stuff working?
Relevant Equations
The seven fundamental physical quantities are length, mass, time, electric current, temperature, amount of substance and intensity of light
L=Velocity x time here length is directly proportional to time so come is it independent as it should be since it's a fundamental physical quantity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just a matter of convention. You can choose to work in units where there is only a single fundamental physical dimension. It depends on how you define your system of units.
 
then the 7 fundamental physical quantities that we read are they incorrect ?
 
No. There is no correct/incorrect here. Just definitions.
 
Orodruin said:
No. There is no correct/incorrect here. Just definitions.
so they have been chosen according to what conventions
 
Manish_529 said:
so they have been chosen according to what conventions
Choosing them is the convention.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top