Funny Story: Naval Aviator Shoots Self Down - Read Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter FredGarvin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reading
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The thread discusses a humorous story about a Naval Aviator who reportedly shot himself down, with participants sharing links to the article and engaging in light banter. The conversation also touches on technical aspects of aviation, particularly regarding the concept of "zero G" and its implications for aircraft behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants share a link to a story about a Naval Aviator, with some experiencing issues accessing it.
  • One participant mentions the analysis and WT testing related to predicting release behavior in aviation.
  • Questions arise regarding the meaning of "zero G," with one participant suggesting it indicates rapid descent, while another clarifies that it relates to the airplane's pitch without specifying ascent or descent.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of negative G forces on pilots, with speculation about the implications of full nose down commands.
  • A participant reflects on the dangers faced by pilots at high altitudes, referencing an SR-71 incident involving frozen helmets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the humorous nature of the story and share experiences related to accessing the article. However, there is some disagreement regarding the interpretation of "zero G" and its implications for aircraft behavior, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some technical terms and assumptions about aircraft dynamics are not fully defined, leading to varying interpretations among participants.

FredGarvin
Science Advisor
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
10
Every now and then a really good short read comes around. I thought I'd pass this one on. It is a funny story about the only Naval Aviator to get credit (really notoriety) for shooting himself down.

http://www.aerospacetestinginternational.com/downloads/trailblazers.pdf"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Fred, old buddy, old pal... I'm heartbroken. "Safari can't find the server". :frown:
Can you provide a different link, or an address?
 
I couldn't get it either Danger. I finally found it by searching the website for stories and found a link. The link Fred shows is correct, but for whatever reason, it seems to be broken.

Click on this:
http://www.aerospacetestinginternational.com/exclusive_articles.php
Then scroll down to the bottom and click on the "Trailblazers - F14" link.

Nice story by the way. Gotta hate when things just refuse to go right. Lord knows we've all been there...
 
Thanks, Q.
That link worked. Unfortunately, I'll have to wait a while before I can check it out. I got a paragraph or so in when Lucy (the cat) decided to occupy my lap and pull off my reading glasses. I don't need them for regular PF stuff, but the type in that article is pretty small. I'll check back to it later.
 
Just copy and paste the link. It is a pdf file so you can zoom in pretty good. Awesome read!
 
Thanks, MoroH. That worked, after a few attempts. My stylus is a bit broken (another remnant of the ex stumbling across my stuff), so it took a couple of shots to top-click without disconnecting the battery.
Someone just called and invited me to supper, though, so reading it will have to wait.
 
Great story! Interesting about the analysis and WT testing they do to predict release behavior!
 
May I ask a question?

When it says "zero G," does that mean that the airplane is rapidly descending? I suppose this would make sense since the "full nose up stabilator command" saved them from the plane rotating completely upside down if the "full nose down" command was given?

pardon for the lack of technical terms!
 
  • #10
The outcome of this one wasn't quite as good: http://www.alexisparkinn.com/sr-71_break-up.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
MotoH said:
May I ask a question?

When it says "zero G," does that mean that the airplane is rapidly descending?
It just means the plane is in the process of pitching down, it doesn't actually tell us whether it was ascending or decending. Depending on the speed and the attitude when the pitch-down is started, it can take many seconds before the nose goes past level. And if I had to guess, the test was conducted just as the nose was passing level.

I suppose this would make sense since the "full nose up stabilator command" saved them from the plane rotating completely upside down if the "full nose down" command was given?
Even if the plane started straight and level, a full nose down command itself would probably incapacitate the pilots as people can't handle anywhere near as many negative g's as positive. And then there's the water...
 
  • #12
I read that SR-71 story in a book I have about them. How friggin' crazy would that be? Free falling at some insane altitude and you can't see because your helmet is frozen. Whoa.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K