G-force diagram on a roller coaster?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the g-force measurements recorded during a roller coaster ride, particularly focusing on the z, x, and y directions. As the coaster ascends, the z-direction g-force increases from -1 to about -0.6, while the y-direction decreases from -0.4 to -0.9, indicating changes in gravitational force and acceleration. Participants express confusion about how to interpret these forces and how to accurately draw a force diagram, questioning the role of gravity and other accelerations. The ride's description highlights a steady incline followed by a flat semicircular track, which influences the recorded forces. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexities of measuring and interpreting forces during roller coaster dynamics.
eri139
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
So for my physics class, we rode on a roller coaster with our phones to record g-force data in the x, y, and z directions. We recorded the moment we were going up, a moment at the top of the coaster when it was just flat (no change in height, but the coaster was still moving around in a semi-circle shape), and a moment as we were going down. We have to draw the g-force diagram for the roller coaster for all 3 moments. I get force diagrams for 2-d diagrams, with the force of gravity and the normal force and all that, but for 3-d I'm so lost. It also doesn't help that I don't know what the x, y, and z directions are, since I've seen xyz graphs online with the z pointing upwards and others with the y. I used the app Physics Toolbox, by the way.
Relevant Equations
F = ma?
So, while we were going up the track, the z-direction gforce seemed to go up. It went from -1 to about -0.6. The x-direction seemed to be around 0, more or less? All x values were under 0.177. The y-direction decreased, more or less, from -0.4 to -0.9.

I think if I understand how the force diagram while going up I might be able to handle the rest of the moments we recorded.

I think the x direction is supposed to be the roller coaster going directly left or right, which would make the g-force 0, as shown in the data.

And I think the force of gravity should decrease with increasing altitude. So would that match up with the y-direction being the upwards direction, since it decreases? Or the z-direction, since it technically increases but the values are negative?

And, how would I draw the force diagram? Are there any forces that I would include besides gravitational and the force making the coaster go up? And which directions would all of my forces be acting? Should I draw in Fg with the two different components?

How do I do this? Please help, I'm so confused!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eri139 said:
And I think the force of gravity should decrease with increasing altitude.
Just how high is this roller coaster? Were you equipped with space suits?!
Your meter measured forces exerted on it. Other than gravity, those forces would be associated with accelerations - not height, not velocity, just accelerations.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
We recorded the moment we were going up
was there only one such moment ?

Describe your ride, clearly indicate how you held the phone all the time.
Best make a graph that represents the ride, with the recording periods indicated.
Do you still have the phone, so you can try to sort out which is up/down and which is forward ?
 
haruspex said:
Just how high is this roller coaster? Were you equipped with space suits?!
Your meter measured forces exerted on it. Other than gravity, those forces would be associated with accelerations - not height, not velocity, just accelerations.
Ooh, okay. So the gravitational force wouldn't change with such a small difference in height?
But I can't think of any other accelerations that would be acting on the roller coaster besides the mechanisms that are making it move forward. Unless that acceleration was divided up into the z and y components, which is what the meter is measuring? And the x is just in a totally different direction and there's no forces acting that way?

Sorry, I'm just still a little bit confused by this.
 
BvU said:
was there only one such moment ?

Describe your ride, clearly indicate how you held the phone all the time.
Best make a graph that represents the ride, with the recording periods indicated.
Do you still have the phone, so you can try to sort out which is up/down and which is forward ?

The ride started with the roller coaster going up on a steady incline. Then, at a higher height, it just stayed parallel to the ground as it moved on a flat track in a semicircular shape. Then, it went down. We just held the phone close to our laps so they wouldn't fall off the ride.

So we just made a graph (my lab partner finally finished it so I only saw it now). The time spans about 5 seconds. The x is hovering around 0, as I said. But the y starts at -0.4 and then starts hovering around -0.75. The z starts at -1 and starts hovering around -0.8.

I've tried playing around with the phone but it's not really giving me any clear results.
 
eri139 said:
But I can't think of any other accelerations that would be acting on the roller coaster besides the mechanisms that are making it move forward. Unless that acceleration was divided up into the z and y components,
Certainly it is divided into those components by your recording device, but I am guessing those directions are not fixed in the ground frame. So the z component is normal to the incline of the track , right?
And it isn't just a question of moving forward.
eri139 said:
The ride started with the roller coaster going up on a steady incline
If that's a straight line at a steady speed it should only record gravity, but because of the angle of the device it will be as z and y components.
If it is going faster then there will be some extra y component.
eri139 said:
at a higher height, it just stayed parallel to the ground as it moved on a flat track in a semicircular shape.
So that’s a semicircle in a horizontal plane? If that is at constant speed, which way do you think the acceleration is?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top