Galactic Black Holes: % & Types Explored

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omega0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes
AI Thread Summary
A significant percentage of galaxies are believed to harbor supermassive black holes (SMBHs) at their centers, although the exact percentage remains uncertain due to limited observations of the universe. The discussion highlights the possibility that some ancient galaxies, formed shortly after the universe's inception, may not contain SMBHs, with direct collapse black holes being a potential formation mechanism. Research suggests that SMBHs could form rapidly in the early universe, influencing galaxy formation. Several academic papers were shared to explore the concept of direct collapse black holes further. Overall, the consensus leans toward a high prevalence of SMBHs in massive galaxies.
Omega0
Messages
215
Reaction score
52
Hi,
what is the percentage of Galaxies where we expect a central black hole?
What type are those Galaxies?
Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Wikipedia answers this with the first sentence of the article, including two references:
A supermassive black hole (SMBH) is the largest type of black hole, on the order of hundreds of thousands to billions of solar masses (M☉), and is found in the center of almost all massive galaxies.[1][2]
 
  • Like
Likes Generator Gawl
mfb said:
Wikipedia answers this with the first sentence of the article, including two references:
This is the answer I expected. Can't say all galaxies since we have only observed a tiny portion of the universe. What if there was a galaxy out there that didn't have a super massive black hole? Time and more research will tell.
 
Chronos said:
The prevailing opinion is a very high percentage of galaxies harbor an SMBH. See http://brainlagoon.com/2014/04/06/does-every-galaxy-have-a-black-hole-at-the-center/ for f discussion
Thank you for providing that article, Chronos. I enjoyed the read. Do you believe or have knowledge of the structure of ancient galaxies? I can't imagine there being a black hole, let alone a SMBH at the center of the earliest known galaxies. I'm talking of galaxies a few hundred million years after the universe came into existence.
 
Direct collapse black holes remain a candidte possibility. Generally this scenario permits SMBH to form very rapidly in the early universe and anchor the formation of galaxies. You may find these papers of interest:http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0545, Did supermassive black holes form by direct collapse?; http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1369here http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1369, Supermassive Black Hole Formation at High Redshifts via Direct Collapse: Physical Processes in the Early Stage; and http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5267, The First Billion Years project: birthplaces of direct collapse black hole
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes Generator Gawl
Chronos said:
Direct collapse black holes remain a candidte possibility. Generally this scenario permits SMBH to form very rapidly in the early universe and anchor the formation of galaxies. You may find these papers of interest:http://arxiv.org/abs/0709.0545, Did supermassive black holes form by direct collapse?; http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1369here http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.1369, Supermassive Black Hole Formation at High Redshifts via Direct Collapse: Physical Processes in the Early Stage; and http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.5267, The First Billion Years project: birthplaces of direct collapse black hole
Thank you for responding, Chronos, and thank you for providing these documents. I never thought of a black hole directly collapsing. I'll read these and find out for myself!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Back
Top