Galois Extensions: Homework Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter shoplifter
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Galois nature of field extensions involving \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})\) and \(\mathbb{Q}(\beta + i\beta)\), where \(\beta\) is the positive fourth root of 5. It is established that \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})\) is a Galois extension over \(\mathbb{Q}\) since it is the splitting field of the polynomial \(x^2 + 5\) with distinct roots. However, the Galois status of \(\mathbb{Q}(\beta + i\beta)\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\) and \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})\) remains uncertain, with attempts to identify explicit separable polynomials proving challenging.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Galois theory and its definitions
  • Familiarity with splitting fields and polynomial roots
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Basic concepts of field extensions in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Galois extensions in field theory
  • Study the concept of splitting fields and their significance in Galois theory
  • Explore the relationship between roots of polynomials and field extensions
  • Investigate the implications of separable polynomials in determining Galois extensions
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, mathematicians specializing in field theory, and anyone interested in the properties of Galois extensions and polynomial roots.

shoplifter
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let \beta be a real, positive fourth root of 5. Is \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5}) Galois over \mathbb{Q}? How about \mathbb{Q}(\beta + i\beta)/\mathbb{Q} or \mathbb{Q}(\beta + i\beta)/\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5})?


Homework Equations



An extension is Galois when it is normal and separable.

The Attempt at a Solution



Any push whatsoever in the right direction would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you tell me anything at all about those extensions?
 
Do you know a condition equivalent to being Galois that involves splitting?
 
well, a field A is galois over B if it is the splitting field of some polynomial in B[x] which has distinct roots in A.

so then, \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-5}) is the splitting field of the polynomial x^2 + 5, which has coefficients in \mathbb{Q}. this is because x^2 + 5 = (x + \sqrt{-5})(x - \sqrt{-5}), and hence the roots are also distinct, and so in the first case, we do have a galois extension.

but i can't apply this to the second two ideas, because i can't tell anything about the field \mathbb{Q}(\beta + i\beta). it doesn't seem to be the same as \mathbb{Q}(i, \beta) or anything of the sort. am i missing something obvious?

thanks so much.
 
also, thinking about the polynomial (x + \beta + i\beta)(x + \beta - i\beta)(x - \beta + i\beta)(x - \beta - i\beta) doesn't help, because it gives me the information that \mathbb{Q}(\beta + i\beta) is galois over \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}), but nothing else, and i don't see how this helps in the problem.
 
Last edited:
shoplifter said:
also, thinking about the polynomial (x + \beta + i\beta)(x + \beta - i\beta)(x - \beta + i\beta)(x - \beta - i\beta) doesn't help, because it gives me the information that \mathbb{Q}(\beta + i\beta) is galois over \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5}), but nothing else, and i don't see how this helps in the problem.

Is b-ib really in Q(b+ib)?
 
no, it isn't, but it doesn't follow that it's not galois, right? I've worked for a while, and can't find explicit separable polynomials whose splitting fields are precisely those, but then what does that prove?

i really don't see a way to disprove they're galois extensions. even if they are, i can't find the explicit polynomials, but my intuition points to a disproof. =( but how do i do that?
 
oh i got the fact that it's galois over the third one -- from the polynomial x^2 - 2i*b^2.

what about the last one?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K