Garrity's Formula: Ordering Covariant Alternating Tensors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Garrity's formula for transforming 2-form fields into tangent vector fields and the conventions for ordering vectors in the standard basis for /\2(R3). The transformation rules provided by Garrity include T_2(α_i e^i) and T_1(ω), along with the relationship T_2(dω) = curl(T_1(ω)). The ordering of the basis vectors is identified as "alphabetical," contrasting with the Hodge dual basis. The conversation raises questions about the general applicability of this convention to /\k(Rn) and the terminology used for these bases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and their transformations
  • Familiarity with the exterior derivative in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of vector fields and their representations
  • Concept of Hodge duality in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the Hodge dual basis in various dimensions
  • Explore the implications of ordering conventions in differential forms
  • Study the applications of Garrity's formula in mathematical physics
  • Learn about the relationship between exterior derivatives and curl in vector calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of differential geometry seeking to deepen their understanding of tensor fields and their transformations, particularly in the context of Garrity's work.

Rasalhague
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2
I have a question about Garrity's formula at the top of p. 125, here, for a function from the set of 2-form fields to the set of tangent vector fields, together with the formula on p. 123 for the exterior derivative of a 1-form field and Theorem 6.3.1 on p. 125 (Garrity: All the Mathematics you Missed).

These relations seem to depend on a convention for ordering the vectors of a standard basis for /\2(R3). Is that right? Is there a convention for ordering the vectors of a standard basis for /\k(Rn). If so, what is the convention?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


To elaborate: where the manifold is R3, Garrity gives the following rule for transforming a 2-form field into a tangent vector field:

[tex]T_2(\alpha_i \, e^i)=\alpha_3 \, \partial_1 - \alpha_2 \, \partial_2 + \alpha_1 \, \partial_3 = (\alpha_3,-\alpha_2,\alpha_1),[/tex]

where ei is a constant basis field for /\2(R3), consisting of wedge products of all permutations of pairs of coordinate basis 1-form fields with indices in ascending order: (1,2), (1,3), (2,3). He gives the following rule for transforming a 1-form field into a tangent vector field:

[tex]T_1(\omega) = (\omega_1,\omega_2,\omega_3),[/tex]

and the following rule relating the exterior derivative of a differentiable 1-form field to the curl of its corresponding tangent vector field:

[tex]T_2(\mathrm{d}\omega) = \text{curl}(T_1(\omega)).[/tex]


Now, consider a differentiable 1-form field

[tex]\omega = \omega_i \, \mathrm{d}x^i.[/tex]

By the coordinate-basis definition of the exterior derivative,

[tex]\mathrm{d} \omega = \mathrm{d}\omega_i \wedge \mathrm{d}x^i[/tex]

[tex]=\mathrm{d} \omega = \left ( \partial_k \omega_i \, \mathrm{d}x^k \right ) \wedge \mathrm{d}x^i[/tex]

[tex]=\left ( \partial_1 \omega_2 - \partial_2 \omega_1 \right ) \mathrm{d}x^1 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^2 + \left ( \partial_1 \omega_3 - \partial_3 \omega_1 \right ) \mathrm{d}x^1 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^3 + \left ( \partial_2 \omega_3 - \partial_3 \omega_2 \right ) \mathrm{d}x^2 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^3.[/tex]


The foregoing implies Garrity is using the order

[tex](e^1, e^2, e^3) = \left ( \mathrm{d}x^1 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^2 \right, \mathrm{d}x^1 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^3, \mathrm{d}x^2 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^3 ).[/tex]

I notice that this differs in order from the dual basis to the coordinate basis, when /\2(R3) is "considered as" the dual space to /\1(R3), i.e.

[tex]( \mathrm{d}x^2 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^3, \mathrm{d}x^3 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^1, \mathrm{d}x^1 \wedge \mathrm{d}x^2).[/tex]

The Garrity basis, in this case, is ordered "alphabetically". Is that convention followed for /\k(Rn) generally? Are there standard names for each of these bases: the "Hodge dual basis" and the "alphabetic basis"?

EDIT: Oh, I see he calls the (Hodge) dual basis to {dxi} the "natural basis". I don't think he gives a particular name to his alphabetic basis. Perhaps he considers the latter too natural to need a name : )
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
14K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K