Gauss' law and flux concept issues

AI Thread Summary
Flux is defined as proportional to the number of electric field lines passing through a given area. For a 2D circle enclosing a charge, the flux is calculated as 2q/Epsilon, which is correct. However, a 3D sphere with the same diameter also encloses the same charge, resulting in the same flux of 2q/Epsilon. The confusion arises because a sphere, being a closed surface, allows Gauss's law to apply, while a circle does not since it is not closed. Understanding that only closed surfaces can be used with Gauss's law clarifies the concept of flux in this context.
engineeringstudnt
Messages
15
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Gauss's law and flux concept issues
Relevant Equations
flux=Qenclosing/Epsilon
Hi guys i have some concept issues about flux. My book says flux is proportional to the number of lines passing through that area. so my question is: first i am thinking that a 2D circle which has a 2r diameter and it is enclosing a 2q charge so its flux should be 2q/Epsilon.then i am thinking a 3D sphere which have a 2r diamater again. so its flux should be 2q/Epsilon too ,right ?

but how ? isn't the sphere has more electric field lines passing through its area ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Gaussian surface must be a closed surface. A circle in three-dimensional space isn't a closed surface, so Gauss's law won't hold.
 
  • Like
Likes engineeringstudnt
thank you very much i am thinking about this almost 45 minutes :D
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top