Gauss's law for electrodynamics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Gauss's law in the context of electrodynamics, exploring its theoretical foundations, mathematical interpretations, and potential experimental verifications. Participants examine the relationship between Gauss's law and Maxwell's equations, as well as its implications for electric and magnetic fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Gauss's law can be qualitatively proven by demonstrating that the electric field inside a charged closed surface is zero, while questioning how this can be experimentally verified in electrodynamics.
  • Others propose that Gauss's law is a specific case of Stokes's theorem, although some later clarify that this interpretation may be incorrect and that Gauss's law is more accurately described as a physical law relating electric charges to electric fields.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the relationship between Stokes's theorem and Gauss's law, particularly in the context of Gauss's law for magnetism, noting that it indicates the absence of magnetic monopoles.
  • Another participant mentions that Gauss's law follows from Maxwell's equations when combined with the continuity equation for charge density, suggesting that taking the divergence leads to a direct relationship.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of varying electric fields and the necessity of accompanying magnetic fields, referencing Maxwell's equations to support their claims.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between Gauss's law and Stokes's theorem, as well as the implications of varying electric fields. There is no consensus on the best way to experimentally verify Gauss's law in the context of electrodynamics, and multiple competing interpretations of the law's foundations are present.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific interpretations of mathematical theorems and physical laws, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the experimental verification of Gauss's law under varying conditions.

hercules68
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Gauss's law can be proved qualitatively by proving that the field inside a charged closed surface is zero. However Maxwells' equations says that gauss's law holds true even for electrodynamics. how can this be verified experimentally? Thanks in advance !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gauss's law, is a specific case of Stokes's theorem.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoke's_theorem

edit: I interpreted Gauss's law to mean the divergence theorem, which is a mathematical statement. My mistake; that would probably be called Gauss's theorem.
 
Last edited:
Khashishi said:
Gauss's law is a specific case of Stoke's theorem.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stoke's_theorem

Gauss' law is a law of physics that relates electric charges to electric fields.

Stoke's theorem is a purely mathematical statement, like the commutative property of addition.
 
I am not good in definitions but I did look into Gauss Law. I really don't see the relation of Stokes and Gauss. Even in Gauss law for magnetism:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27s_law_for_magnetism

It only said \nabla \cdot \vec B = 0\; where it states there is no mono magnetic pole.

Gauss law is mainly used in Divergence theorem where \nabla \cdot \vec E=\frac {\rho_v}{\epsilon} Where:

\int_v \nabla\cdot \vec E dv'=\int_s \vec E\cdot d\vec s'=\frac Q {\epsilon}

http://phy214uhart.wikispaces.com/Gauss%27+Law

http://phy214uhart.wikispaces.com/Gauss%27+Law

The only one that remotely relate magnetic field through a surface is:

\int_s \nabla X\vec B\cdot d\vec s'=\int_c \vec B \cdot d \vec l'= \mu I

that relate current loop with field through the loop.
 
Last edited:
hercules68 said:
Gauss's law can be proved qualitatively by proving that the field inside a charged closed surface is zero. However Maxwells' equations says that gauss's law holds true even for electrodynamics. how can this be verified experimentally? Thanks in advance !
1. The charged closed surface must be a conductor.
2. I don't know of any direct experimental test for a time varying E field.
The fact that its inclusion in Maxwell's equations leads to many verifiable results is an indirect proof of its general validity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davidbenari
I just want to say that gauss law follow immediately from maxwell's fourth eqn when combined with continuity eqn for charge density.(just take the divergence)
 
I can't think of any direct prove on Gauss surface with varying charge inside. But I cannot see anything wrong that the total electric field radiate out of a closed surface varying due to vary charge enclosed by the closed surface still obey \int_s \vec E\cdot d\vec s'.

The difference is with varying charges generating the varying electric field, a magnetic field MUST be generated to accompany the varying electric field according to:

\nabla X \vec E=-\frac{\partial \vec B}{\partial t}
 
andrien said:
I just want to say that gauss law follow immediately from maxwell's fourth eqn when combined with continuity eqn for charge density.

Let us see,
c2(∇×B)=j/ε0+∂E/∂t
now,
c2{∇.(∇×B)}=∇.j/ε0+∂(∇.E)/∂t
USING ∇.j=-∂ρ/∂t and the fact that gradient of curl vanishes.
one gets,
∇.E=ρ/ε0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K