Biology Gel Electrophoresis of DNA fragments produced by apoptosis

  • Thread starter Thread starter i_love_science
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna produced
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expected outcomes of gel electrophoresis for DNA fragments resulting from apoptosis. It is noted that only a 250 bp fragment would be present and that it would appear brighter. Some participants express confusion about the absence of larger fragments, suggesting that degradation would produce a variety of sizes. The analogy of chewing peanuts to illustrate the breakdown of DNA into smaller fragments is introduced. The conversation highlights the complexities of DNA digestion and the implications for fragment size in gel electrophoresis.
i_love_science
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
One mechanism involved in apoptosis is the digestion of DNA by DNAases. DNA gets digested into fragments of lengths equal to multiples of the distance between nucleosomes.

The figure attached shows the results of separation by gel electrophoresis of the DNA released by the action of DNAase.

Suggest how the pattern in the left-hand column would change if very high concentrations of DNAase were applied to the cells.
Relevant Equations
gel electrophoresis
Electrophoresis.png


The answer is that there would only be a 250 bp fragment, and it would be brighter.

I think that there would just more fragments of all sizes, as more DNA is degraded. I don't understand why there wouldn't be fragments of larger sizes. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not knowing anything about DNA digestion, but just applying some logic: if there is a fragment longer than the single distance between nucleosomes, what will DNAase do to it?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes i_love_science
...or if you chew your peanuts long and vigorously enough you get a mouthful of peanut butter. Not more chunks of peanuts.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes i_love_science

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Partial digest in restriction mapping
Replies
3
Views
2K
Help with interpreting PAGE (polyacrylimide gel electrophoresis) result
Replies
4
Views
2K
How to solve restriction mapping problems?
Replies
3
Views
5K
MHB Why is Fragmentation Offset Multiple of 8? Understanding IPv4 Fragmentation
Replies
1
Views
3K
Why does graphene tend to break during mechanical exfoliation?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Comp Sci How can a 13 bit number represent 16 bit number?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Why Use Restriction Enzymes and Gel Electrophoresis in Molecular Biology?
Replies
3
Views
3K
Questions on DNA recombinant DNA technology?
Replies
3
Views
7K
DNA Replication ~ 5' to 3' direction?
Replies
4
Views
34K
Biology Biology: Genetics: Hardy-weinberg + restriction enzyme
Replies
4
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top