General Formulas for Sequences

AI Thread Summary
For any finite sequence of numbers, there are multiple general rules that can be derived to predict subsequent numbers. A simple example is the sequence 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, which can be described by the rule 2n, but alternative rules can also apply. When presented with unexpected numbers like 42 or 8379356, new rules must be formulated, illustrating the complexity of sequences. The discussion highlights that one can always create a polynomial that fits a finite list of numbers, leading to an infinite number of potential rules. Ultimately, the flexibility in deriving rules for sequences emphasizes the richness of mathematical interpretation.
Pupil
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
Suppose I give you a sequence of numbers such as 2, 4, 6, 8, 10... and ask you to find the next integer. You would probably tell me 12, because the sequence follows the rule 2n where n is the ordinal number. But if I told you the next number in the sequence is 42, your rule wouldn't work, and you'd have to find a new one. Suppose you find this said rule, and I tell you, "nope," because the next integer is 8379356 and the your new rule won't work for this new sequence 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 42, 8379356... But when we think about the original sequence I gave (2, 4, 6, 8, 10...), you found 3 general rules that would work, not just 2n! So my question is then: for any finite list of numbers in a sequence, is there always one or more than one general rule that will work for the series?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top