1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

General method of determining order of poles

  1. Mar 27, 2006 #1
    In Boas on p.595 there's an FCV proof for finding the order of a pole.
    It says to write f(z) as g(z)/[(z-zo)^n] and then write g(z) as a0 + a1(z-z0) .... etc. and that we can deduce that the Laurent series for f(z) begins with (z-z0)^(-n) unless a0 = 0 i.e g(z0) = 0. Therefore the order of the pole is n. However, how can we be sure that g(z) does not contain terms of the form (z-z0)^(-n) ? Is this just by assumption?
    thanks for your help.
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 27, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Definition of order of a pole: z0 is a pole of f(z) of order n if and only if (z-z0)nf(z) is analytic at z0 but (z-z0)n-1f(z) is not.
    The fact that (z-z0)nf(z) is analytic means that is equal to its power series in some neighborhood of z0:
    [tex]f(z)(z-z_0)^n= a_0+ a_1(z-z_0)+ a_2(z-z_0)^2+ ... [/tex]
    and so
    [tex]f(z)= a_0(z-z_0)^{-n}+ a_1(z-z_0)^{1-n}+ a_2(z-z_0){2-n}+...[/tex]

    From the definition of order of a pole and the fact that an analytic function is equal to its Taylor series, it follows that the Laurent series has no term with exponent less than -n.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: General method of determining order of poles
  1. Order of poles (Replies: 1)

  2. Order of a pole (Replies: 2)