General question regarding positive and negatives in equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ascendant78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Positive
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the evaluation of positive and negative values in work-energy and impulse-momentum equations, specifically the equations PEi + KEi + W = PEf + KEf and pi + J = pf. It is established that gravitational acceleration (g) can be either positive or negative depending on the chosen coordinate system, and that potential energy (PE) is calculated as -mgh when height (h) is measured from a baseline. The sign of work (W) is determined by the direction of force and displacement, while kinetic energy (KE) remains positive regardless of the direction of velocity (v). The importance of consistent coordinate systems in determining signs is emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of work-energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with impulse-momentum relationships
  • Knowledge of kinematics and dynamics
  • Basic grasp of coordinate systems and vector directions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of coordinate systems on gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Learn about the role of cosine in work calculations and its effect on sign determination
  • Explore the relationship between force, displacement, and work done in various scenarios
  • Investigate advanced applications of the work-energy theorem in real-world problems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of work-energy and impulse-momentum concepts.

Ascendant78
Messages
327
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am trying to understand when the positive or negative of a specific value in an equation (work-energy and momentum-impulse) is to be evaluated based off the motion diagram and when it is not?

Homework Equations



The ones in particular I am unsure about is work-energy and impulse-momentum:
PEi + KEi + W = PEf + KEf
pi + J = pf

The Attempt at a Solution



I know with kinematics, you must always evaluate the values compared to the motion diagram and assigned positive/negative directions. I know the same goes for forces when using dynamics. I am mainly trying to make sure I understand it right when it comes to the work-energy and impulse-momentum equations.

If I understand correctly, for PE, the g is always considered positive regardless of the motion diagram. For KE, I believe the same goes for the v value. Then for the W, I know the cosθ determines whether it will be positive or negative and the F and Δd are absolute values, making both positive (or 0 of course). So, if I understand correctly, the only thing that takes the positive/negative directions into consideration in work-energy is the cosθ, correct?

As far as momentum-impulse, again if I understand correctly, in these equations the direction of the force and velocity will change each of their respective signs, correct?

Our instructor has not been clear on this, threw both at us the same day, and then sometimes he uses the + or - from problems, sometimes he doesn't. After spending hours on my own trying problems, I think I have it figured out, but I would really appreciate someone confirming this for me.

Also, for future reference, how can you tell when an equation evaluates certain values based on the motion diagram +/- values and when it is evaluated as a magnitude (abs. value) instead?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not that g is always considered positive, it's that g is to be multiplied by a downward displacement (corresponding to loss of PE) to a baseline, and g and the displacement must be measured in the same direction, both positive or both negative. Sorry, got to go now... More later.
 
haruspex said:
It's not that g is always considered positive, it's that g is to be multiplied by a downward displacement (corresponding to loss of PE) to a baseline, and g and the displacement must be measured in the same direction, both positive or both negative. Sorry, got to go now... More later.

So does that mean that if you changed g to a -g, you would have to change the h direction that causes a loss of height to be positive to coincide with the -g? Just trying to make sure I understand you correctly.
 
Ascendant78 said:
So does that mean that if you changed g to a -g, you would have to change the h direction that causes a loss of height to be positive to coincide with the -g? Just trying to make sure I understand you correctly.
It depends what you mean by 'g'. If you mean 'the acceleration due to gravity' then it is just g, but its value is either 9.81 ms-2 or -9.81 ms-2, depending on whether you measure the vertical direction as positive downwards or upwards. Similarly the height h. So the PE is always -mgh. If an object mass M is 10m above the baseline and upwards is positive then h = +10m, g = -9.81 ms-2, the PE is -Mgh = +98.1M m2s-2. (Alternatively, you can regard g as standing for +9.81 ms-2 then say the accn due to gravity is +g or -g depending on whether down or up is positive. I'm not at all sure whether one of those two views is standard.)
Similarly for the KE, it doesn't matter whether v is positive or negative, v2 is always going to be +ve.
For force*distance, again, the signs matter. Distance and force are measured in the same direction, and work done by the force is F d. If you push on a block with force +3N but someone else pushes harder from the other side and you end up retreating 1m then the distance is -1m, so the work done by you is -3J.
So in none of these cases is it true that we just take the absolute values. The sign comes out correctly by applying the rules.
I'm not sure what you meant by the reference to cos theta wrt W. What you do have to watch out for with 'work done' is whether it's work done by (whatever) or work done on that. In my pushing example, the work done by you was -3J, which is the same as saying the work done on you was +3J.

I hope this is clearer now.
 
When you set up the problem, you determine the "coordinate system"- that is, where things are "0" and which directions are positive and negative. It is common to take positive to be "up" and negative "down" but that is a convention.
 
I get it now. Thanks for clarifying. After toying with some problems, changing my coordinate systems, and seeing what does and doesn't come up with the same values, I think I got it all down now. I appreciate you all taking the time to help me out with this. Take care.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
958
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K