General relativity question: Gravity clock

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter logicalmorality
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Gravity Speed
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a gravity-powered clock, specifically an hourglass, in relation to gravitational effects and general relativity. Participants explore how gravity influences the speed of such a clock and the implications of gravitational time dilation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that a gravity-powered clock, like an hourglass, should increase speed with increasing gravity, while also potentially decreasing speed due to general relativity.
  • Another participant argues that what is termed a "gravity powered clock" does not function as a clock in the context of relativity, as it relies on a specific gravitational field for time measurement.
  • It is noted that there are competing effects, such as the impact of free fall on the operation of an hourglass and the need for recalibration of such clocks when moved to different gravitational fields.
  • One participant emphasizes that all clocks in a gravitational field run slightly slower compared to clocks at infinity, and this must be considered when comparing an hourglass to an atomic clock.
  • A later reply critiques the initial reasoning, asserting that physics requires mathematical modeling rather than intuitive reasoning, and distinguishes between "acceleration due to gravity" and "gravitational time dilation," indicating that they do not necessarily correlate.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between gravity and the operation of gravity-powered clocks, with no consensus reached on how these factors interact or the implications for time measurement.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about gravitational effects, the definitions of gravity in different contexts, and the mathematical models referenced, which remain unresolved.

logicalmorality
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Would a gravity powered clock increase or decrease speed? For example an hourglass.
Would a gravity powered clock increase or decrease speed? Take an hourglass. It should increase speed as gravity increases because it's powered by gravity... But it should also decrease speed because of general relativity...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you call a ”gravity powered clock” is not a clock in the sense of relativity. It presumes a particular gravitational field to convert a measurement into a corresponding time.
 
There can be competing effects. In fact, you can easily stop an hour glass from working at all by letting it be in free fall.

Assuming you mean "an hour glass at fixed altitude", it's rate decreases compared to an atomic clock colocated with it as you increase in altitude. This is because an hourglass (or pendulum clock) must be recalibrated for the local gravitational field strength.

Independent of that, all clocks in a gravitational field run slightly slow compared to clocks at infinity. So once you've recalibrated your hourglass to match a co-located atomic clock, it'll still be running slightly slow compared to a clock at infinity.

Essentially, the problem is, as Orodruin just said, that such "gravity powered" clocks are not reliable clocks if they are moved to different gravitational field strengths.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale and PeroK
logicalmorality said:
Take an hourglass. It should increase speed as gravity increases because it's powered by gravity... But it should also decrease speed because of general relativity...
Your reasoning here is faulty. You can't do physics by waving your hands and stringing words together. You need to use the math of the theory to make predictions and then compare those predictions with what is actually observed. As long as there is a consistent mathematical model of the scenario that makes predictions that match what we observe, it doesn't matter that that model does not match whatever vague intuitive sense you have of what "looks right".

Also, you are making a simple and common but fundamental error: "gravity" in GR is not just one thing. An hourglass with greater "gravity" in the sense of "acceleration due to gravity" will run out faster, as seen by an observer right next to it, if we just take that one effect into account. But "gravity" in the sense of gravitational time dilation is different from "acceleration due to gravity", and deals with what the hourglass's behavior looks like to an observer who is not right next to it. There is nothing that requires what those two different observers observe to be the same.

Further, you cannot make a blanket statement that greater "acceleration due to gravity" always corresponds to greater gravitational time dilation. That is false as a general statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
996
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K